He did his Ph.D. at U of Minnesota - as I recall - and he is a state over on a farm. He was nice enough to reply to my emails to him, a couple years ago.
In this vid - he kicks off mentioning the suppressed electromagnetic equations - something I mentioned recently again. This was pointed out to me as well by the Brazilian correspondent yogi - Guto Novo.
And so when I searched noncommutative phase Tesla alternative current - I discovered that indeed this was the secret of Tesla's sound-current ether - noncommutative - and it was suppressed. Essentially Tesla had discovered Louis de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony.
Robbins mispronounces de Broglie's name. Oh well. It's "De-Broy" - but that's French for you.
His newest vid was uploaded 2 hours ago! On the paradox of "mind" uploading.
Steinmetz figures prominently - and it was Steinmetz who realized that Tesla had utilized noncommutative phase as the secret of "wattless power."
As I quoted Tesla - the ether is a longitudinal wave - as de Broglie also figured out - and both utilized a noncommutative model. Tesla was a visionary samadhi genius while Steinmetz figured out the math for his model of reality.
Even Leonard Susskind in a new self-published "letter" admits that EP=EPR in its "strong form" means that GR=QM or that quantum entanglement enables a "back-reaction in black holes so that black holes act as worm holes.
In other words this is the real ether and what shamanic spiritual masters have been saying is true all along!
Susskind is a well-accepted top quantum physicist - and now he is agreeing with Nobel Laureate Gerard t'Hooft, that we live within virtual micro-black holes from quantum entanglement.
So then Stephen E. Robbins notes that Heaviside got ride of the quaternions in Maxwells equations that would have then explained the ether - the quaternions being the noncommutative phase!
But as Robbins notes Heaviside was not interested in working on the ether and so the loss was probably not a "conspiracy" or conscious plan to avoid the ether.
Robbins on Bergson and Bohm, Holographic Mind
Bergson's Holographic Theory - 1 - The image of the external world
Robbins proves that Bergson was the West's deepest philosopher EVER.
Bergson's understanding of music is truly Pythagorean as the empirical truth of sound is the infinite time-frequency resonance, (see Sir James Jeans, Sound and Music). So essentially 2 (the octave) does not go into 3 (the Perfect Fifth) and we listen to sound, inherently, in contrast to science assuming an external measurement of sound has to be made. The musical origins of Western math was exposed by math professor Luigi Borzacchini in his 2007 published article on the continuum and incommensurability and music theory. Borzacchini called the cover-up of the music origin of Western math to be "really astonishing" and "shocking." And in fact the truth is noncommutative phase - as Borzacchini noted for Pythagoreans music was neither discrete nor a continuum. So Bergson intuitively understood the truth of music - and as an inherent memory storage as time, this is amazing!
Dear Dr. Robbins: I discovered your new youtube
vids and am enjoying the explications! In May I discovered quantum
physicist Eddie Oshins who had worked with Pribram. Oshins gives his
critique of why Pribram was wrong: http://www.quantumpsychology.
So
Oshins completely corroborates what I had realized - that the
nonwestern spiritual energy training is based on the secret of
noncommutative phase as the ether - (the same secret of the quaternions
in Maxwell - as "wattless power"). Oshins was a Stanford quantum
physicist but his research was all on the psychological implications and
philosophy of quantum mechanics - and he also taught Wing Chun (Bruce
Lee's lineage). So he realized that the mind-body training of Daoist
culture was completely based on the secret of noncommutative phase as
the aether!
I personally know the ether is real since I
did the training in nonwestern alchemy - I know qigong masters who can
leave their body at will - and it does feel like the ether has been
activated as dynamic force - as reverse entropy energy! This is called
"yuan qi" in Daoist alchemy.
Dear Dr. Robbins: I did also correspond with
Professor Basil J. Hiley who replied that indeed he understands
noncommutative time-frequency energy. So the argument of Hiley is that
he uses a noncommutative algebra that itself is a consciousness working
at time equals zero. So Hiley is saying this algebra works in the
implicit order but since it is noncommutative as a math then it
resonates with the noncommutative time-frequency energy dynamic itself.
I
myself align more with de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony - at least as
far as quantum relativity is concerned and there is a recent upsurge in
returning de Broglie's "double solution" soliton model that is
nonlinear. For example the recent hydrodynamics experiment that
corroborates de Broglie's model on the macro-scale. So similar to Bohm
using the enfolded holomovement model, the recent hydrodynamics shows
how a pilot wave then "guides" the particle through the double slit, as
entanglement in reality, not just a mathematical abstraction.
So
as per the Law of Phase Harmony - when the light is "turned around"
then it is at zero time but there is a hidden momentum to light from
negative entropy - the relativistic mass of light (not the rest mass).
This is the source of the reverse entropy phonons as the ether energy,
called Yuan Qi in Taoist alchemy. So the Law of Phase Harmony says
frequency (light) is to time (Emptiness) as momentum (qi or prana) is to
wavelength (jing or physical energy).
Again my blog has more details - along with a free pdf on training with the science citations and images, etc.
thanks again,
Dear Dr. Robbins: Eddie Oshins coined the term "quantum
psychology" in the 1970s and again it was based on noncommutative phase.
So he was quite peeved that Goswami promoted quantum psychology without
referencing Oshins nor considering his argument - despite Goswami
knowing about Oshins. Whether Goswami knew about Bergson, who knows?
haha. But Oshins remained unknown and did not like the New Age
popularization of quantum psychology that remained unaware of his
origination of the discipline, based on noncommutative phase.
thanks,Dear Dr. Robbins: your reference to Zeno's Paradox is corroborated by math Professor Joe Mazur who wrote, "The Motion Paradox." I had read his book "Euclid in the Rainforest" about his trip to Costa Rica. I replied that I had studied conservation biology and sustainability for a University semester in Costa Rica and I did not think that Western math was helping to save the rainforest (as he claimed it was). So he asked me to review, "the Motion Paradox" which I did on amazon.com - and now Mazur is working on a new book on time perception - for Cambridge University Press. He said he will have a chapter on music. I asked him to include precognition! I wonder if he will.
Professor
Mazur does an expert job of giving the behind-the-scenes wrangling of
conceptual philosophy which gave rise to applied science. What is the
difference between time and motion exactly? If that question seems too
abstract, this book proves the opposite.
Most college graduates assume that Zeno's paradoxes of motion were solved by calculus with its continuous functions. Mazur puts the calculus at the heart of the book, from Descartes and Cavalieri to Galileo, Newton and last but not least Mazur's favorite: Gabrielle-Emilie de Breteuil.
In fact, upon investigation, one finds many top scientists still studying and learning from the anomalies in infinite measurement. Regarding relativity Mazur states the wonder of absolute motion is that it "conspires with our measuring instruments to prevent any possibility of detection."
As Mazur points out "we don't measure with infinitesmial instruments" and so the perceptual illusion of time continuity remains despite the reliance of science on discrete symbols. With attempts at a unification of quantum mechanics and relativity Zeno's paradoxes reemerge with full-force in the "Calabi-Yau manifold." Mazur writes that the original concept of dimension still holds but now means measuring more by abstract reason than by sight.
Although each scientist featured by Mazur appears to have increasingly solved the paradox of motion in the end I think Zeno will be avenged and science will return to right back where it started. There seems to be a deadlocked struggle between discreteness (particle) and continuity (wave) in science and Mazur argues that indeed Nature "makes jumps" despite seeming continuous. But Mazur admits we are left with "splitting operations that can take place only in the mind."
Most college graduates assume that Zeno's paradoxes of motion were solved by calculus with its continuous functions. Mazur puts the calculus at the heart of the book, from Descartes and Cavalieri to Galileo, Newton and last but not least Mazur's favorite: Gabrielle-Emilie de Breteuil.
In fact, upon investigation, one finds many top scientists still studying and learning from the anomalies in infinite measurement. Regarding relativity Mazur states the wonder of absolute motion is that it "conspires with our measuring instruments to prevent any possibility of detection."
As Mazur points out "we don't measure with infinitesmial instruments" and so the perceptual illusion of time continuity remains despite the reliance of science on discrete symbols. With attempts at a unification of quantum mechanics and relativity Zeno's paradoxes reemerge with full-force in the "Calabi-Yau manifold." Mazur writes that the original concept of dimension still holds but now means measuring more by abstract reason than by sight.
Although each scientist featured by Mazur appears to have increasingly solved the paradox of motion in the end I think Zeno will be avenged and science will return to right back where it started. There seems to be a deadlocked struggle between discreteness (particle) and continuity (wave) in science and Mazur argues that indeed Nature "makes jumps" despite seeming continuous. But Mazur admits we are left with "splitting operations that can take place only in the mind."
No comments:
Post a Comment