So the amazing synchronicity I had recently, has grown into a deeper delving into this amazing discovery of the noncommutative music truth of reality. I'm talking about the person who co-supervised my Troll Dance fugue music composition for Moog and Mayan flute whistle, 27 years ago. Amazingly after I read a science paper and investigated the author, we had since that time developed parallel interests and he even did qigong research and studied music in India and now is researching the noncommutative math connection as well.

I've been getting more hits on my blog the past few days, since I made the daring claim on youtube that I have debunked the "432 hertz" cult. haha. But most readers do not get past my large "self-selective" introduction, the "weeds" people out, in terms of their seriousness. haha.

I'm not sure how "GM Shore" slipped past my cruising of the interwebs thus far.

His paper on superluminal light is in this book on Time and Matter
And so "gravitational birefringence" takes hold and so we get superluminal phase velocities of light.

O.K. but is it noncommutative?

This year cites his research here:
It is known that the linearly polarized photons can partly transform to
circularly polarized ones via forward Compton scattering in a background
such as the external magnetic field or noncommutative space time.

So what we are considering, in terms of meditation, is an ether that is noncommutative and based on this secret hidden momentum energy of light - the energy being superluminal or faster than the speed of light.

Sure enough I search noncommutative - for his 2003 paper and yes get a hit.

So his big point is that "strong equivalence" of relativity is violated due to quantum mechanics - i.e. the geometric "null cone" of local inertial frames is bypassed by the physical light cone that is superluminal.

And so then he says well now we need to reconsider causality and start discussing time machines! Indeed! But then he states when taking into account General Relativity based on the weak equivalence principle then the time machine does not work, as causality has to be maintained.

In other words for general relativity then the light cone and geometric null cone are equivalent - except for low frequencies!

So that was 2003 - and to get better clarification we go to his 2012 paper,

*The Unbearable Beingness of Light. (photons in black hole spacetimes).*
TJ Hollowood, **GM Shore** - International Journal of Modern Physics …, 2012 - World Scientific

Gravitational tidal forces acting on the virtual e+ e-cloud surrounding a photon endow

spacetime with a nontrivial refractive index. This has remarkable properties unique to

gravitational theories including superluminal low-frequency propagation, in apparent

TJ Hollowood, **GM Shore** - Citeseer

Abstract: Gravitational tidal forces acting on the virtual e+ e− cloud surrounding a photon

endow spacetime with a non-trivial refractive index. This has remarkable properties unique

to gravitational theories including superluminal low-frequency propagation, in apparent

So here they state not only can

low frequency light be superluminal but it can also self-amplify. This is exactly the claim I was citing in my 2015 "Conspirachi" research on the new black hole analysis of Hawking radiation.

And so the meditation secret here is that of the low frequency light of the lower tan t'ien as the Yuan Qi black hole.

Right - so the 2003 paper was published along side Raymond Chiao's research that I cite in the training pdf.

And we get a 2015 paper that corroborates Shore - on photon propagation in noncommutative QED. Fresneda, Gitman and Shabad.

And so this brings us back to the concept of light originating from a superluminal ether that is phonon or sound energy.

#
Causality and the speed of sound

- George F. R. Ellis
- Roy Maartens
- Malcolm A. H. MacCallum

Let's see if I can read this

here - I mean access it but 2 citations stick out:

Erickson
J.K., Caldwell R.R., Steinhardt P.J., Armendariz-Picon C. and Mukhanov
V.F. (2002).

Measuring the speed of sound of quintessence.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.* 88: 121301, arXiv:astro-ph/0112438

CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

So this one states - the speed of sound is a "distinguishable" parameter as the speed of sound of dark energy that is variable against the cosmic background radiation. So sometimes the speed of sound is close to zero, other times of the universe the speed of sound of dark energy - the acoustic oscillations as degeneracy pressure that expands the universe - is faster than the speed of light. And it cites the above Graham M. Shore paper - along with the Cardone sonofusion research! Fascinating! And it dismisses both by stating that relativity spacetime metric supersedes any "sound speed metric." Well I guess that all depends how you define causality! haha.

Bludman S.A. and Ruderman M.A. (1968).

Possibility of the speed of sound exceeding the speed of light in ultradense matter.

*Phys. Rev.* 170: 1176

So what they are saying is yes you can have superluminal sound only you lose the symmetric math of Einstein's equivalence principle in special relativity. They say - well if it is true causally then the symmetric math is wrong.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/.../physicist-george-ellis-knocks-physicists-for-kn...

Jul 22, 2014 - I also befriended *George F. R. Ellis*,
the physicist-mathematician-cosmologist, an authority on the Big Bang
and other cosmic mysteries. Ellis and I hit it off initially because we
share some—how shall I put it?—concerns about the direction of physics,
but I soon discovered that his interests range far beyond

So Ellis is in South Africa.
strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/ellis-maartens-maccallum-relativistic-cosmo.pdf

*George F. R. Ellis* FRS is Professor Emeritus at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. He is co-author ...... Because *causal* communication is limited by the *speed* of light, unless we live in a small universe, there ...... violations of special relativistic *causality* (we can send a signal faster by *sound* than light). Furthermore ...
https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0521381150

*George F. R. Ellis*, Roy Maartens, Malcolm A. H. MacCallum. Unlike conservation laws of the general form ... Firstly, the *speed of sound* must be less than the speed of light, or else we can have violations of special relativistic *causality* (we can send a signal faster by sound than light). Furthermore, local mechanical stability ...
According to Dark Age Theory we need to "burn through" our resources in order to "develop" properly - i.e. we need to destroy the village in order to save it (as was the saying for genocide in Vietnam)