non-commutative approaches to Lorentzian spaces and manifolds with boundary.
A talk by Lee Smolin gets the same promotion of Neo-Platonic lies in the comments:
rossharmonics
I cannot read Plato and even some neo-Platonists such as Proclus or Nicomachus without coming away with something new.
I only say this because my own projects which involve a theory of musical scales, i have found Greek geometry and number theory of immense help. This is from forty something years of research.Rossharmonics is just promote the Lie of Plato based on symmetric math of materialistic idealism: McClain's book: the Pythagorean Plato.
"Magnitudes have all the characteristics Plato attributes to Apeiron."
p. 394
Socratic, Platonic and Aristotelian Studies: Essays in Honor of Gerasimos Santas 2011
And so then you have Proclus directly stating if there were no Apeiron there would be no irrational magnitudes. From this googlebook review link
citing Vassliis Karasmanis, "Continunity and Irrationality in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Mathematics."
Peter Kingsley, a Ph.D. philosopher, had his thesis on Pythagorean philosophy published by Oxford University Press in 1997, Ancient Philosophy, Mystery and Magic. In that book Kingsley says:
“By the time of Plato and Aristotle, the doors of understanding were closed.... Argument [became] more important than appreciation, reinterpretation, an easy substitute for understanding.... [The devolution] destroyed the mythical dialectic.” p. 108, http://peterkingsley.org
Noncommutative geometry and particles (youtube)
Assistant Professor Van Suijlekom: ‘Together with Alain Connes (a world-famous French mathematician who visits Nijmegen on a regular basis) I’m formulating a theory that does include these forces in the space-time model, by proposing that each force has its own space-time. Or, to put it another way: space-time consists not of one but of three layers.’Connes:
a “universal scaling system”, ... this discrete scaling manifests itself in acoustic systems, as is well known in western classical music, where the two scalings correspond, respectively, to passing to the octave (frequency ratio of 2) and transposition (the perfect fifth is the frequency ratio 3/2), with the approximate value log(3)/ log(2) ∼ 19/12 responsible for the difference between the “circulating temperament” of the Well TemperedMathematical physicist Walter van Suijlekom:
Clavier and the “equal temperament” of XIX century music. It is precisely the irrationality of log(3)/ log(2) which is responsible for the noncommutative [complementary opposites as yin/yang] nature of the quotient corresponding to the three places {2, 3,∞}. -Alain Connes
‘My colleague Prof. Renate Loll predicts for example that, on the basis of quantum gravitation, space is four dimensional. Ideally you want to know more than that, for example, to find out what the curvature in quantum space is. NCG gives us the mathematical tools we need to elucidate that curvature.’
As proved by Hawking, had the Universe's entropy increased been reversed, this reversal would be impossible to observe. This is because time orientation of all biological processes (as we show elsewhere in detail) relies solely on entropy's increase.
Avshalom C. Elitzur, Shahar Dolev
Black-Hole Uncertainty Entails An Intrinsic Time Arrow, Dec. 2000
This only assumes that we observe based on light whereas formless awareness is listening as room temperature spin 1/2 phonon or noncommutative time-frequency quantum phase that is half quanta.
Rossharmonics - stop promoting the lies of Plato about time. It's well-documented Plato promoted symmetric time based on irrational magnitude as alogon. This is from the lies of Philolaus and ARchytas. David Fowler refused to engage with math professor Luigi Borzacchini's expose on the secret music theory origins of Western mathematics. You can read this on the academic math forum of 1999. Borzacchini finally got his article published in 2007. Lee Smolin first took quantum mechanics from the same professor I also took the same class from - Professor Herbert J. Bernstein. Bernstein focused on paradoxes of time in nonlocal entanglement of Bells Inequality Theorem. Bernstein stated that the secret to understanding entanglement is entropy and entropy is the direction of time. Plato and Archytas firmly established the direction of time by covered up the law of Pythagoras the frequency is inverse to time. David Fowler refused to engage with this music theory analysis and yet he admitted that music theory revealed the secret of Platonic mathematics. So don't think you are getting the truth about time from Plato and Proclus and Nichomachus because Philolaus lied about his Lyre - he flipped his Lyre around to convert the noncommutative quantum phase from music theory into symmetric time as destructive entropy. To quote David Fowler, author of The Mathematics of Plato’s Academy (Oxford University Press)
“...the manipulations of music theory seem to depend fundamentally on the operation of compounding, an operation which seems to pose some serious problems for mathematicians. My purely speculative suggestion...is that music theory might plausibly give some help with this problem.”
And yet when Borzacchini did the music research - Fowler rejected it! Fowler tried to claim that the ancient greeks never engaged with irrational magnitude from music theory. It is well recognized in quantum cosmology that reality is created from zero spacetime with zero energy as a phase shift of time-frequency uncertainty. But music theory shows that in fact this uncertainty is from noncommutative phase and this has been rediscovered in quantum cosmology as well.
"There is a fine structure in spacetime, exactly as there is a fine structure in spectrals [frequencies].... The idea is to replace a geometric space with an algebra, as an inverse of the Dirac operator, by sending a wave with a constraint on the vibration of the wave, can not vibrate faster than 1, the commutator of the Dirac Operator is less than 1....The spectrum of the Dirac Operator...space is not simply a manifold but multiplied by a noncommutative finite space. There is behind the scene, there is a square root and when you take a square root there is an ambiguity and the ambiguity that is there is from the spin structure....Finite space which is there is essentially the simplest finite space which has dimension zero, as far as the [frequency] spectrum is concerned...."
Alain Connes on Music youtube lecture
Archytas music from divide and average harmonics with 9/8 cubed as the square root of 2 as the secret source of the Pythagorean Theorem from the tritone. So for Archytas - - the equation had to be 3/2 x 4/3 = 2 which is arithmetic mean x harmonic mean = geometric mean squared. That was the first logarithmic equation of Perfect Fifth plus Perfect Fourth = Octave. But it's a lie - as he points out the 12 octaves of the fifths don't line up with the actual octaves based on 2 - as the Pythagorean Comma. but that doesn't matter - unless you are trying to make an instrument with polyphonic harmonics. Orthodox Pythagorean harmonics only used the Octave, Perfect Fifth and Perfect Fourth - as infinite energy resonance and included 5 years of silent meditation as internal listening. What ARchytas did was cover up - from the lies of Philolaus - the basic truth that if C is 1 as the root tonic note then the octave C is 2 as the overtone harmonic and so then 3 is the overtone harmonic as G, the perfect Fifth but 3 is ALSO the subharmonic as 2/3 C to F, Perfect Fifth. Archytas could not use reverse time - but Louis de Broglie with his Law of Phase Harmony rediscovered reverse time!! de Broglie realized that Einstein's relativity goes against the Pythagorean law of energy as frequency inverse to time and so there HAS to be reverse time momentum that is not conserved - for matter to exist and spacetime as a 4D construct to exist. Alain Connes, the top math Fields Medal professor has also made this discovery.
"The point makes a chord between two notes [of the quantum drum]....The two eigenfunctions will be nonzero, ...if you look carefully at the two shapes [isospectral but not isomorphic] It is impossible to make a chord because the corresponding eigenfunction only means to 1 of the 2 pieces So it is zero in the other piece [and vice versa]. So this chord will not be possible. Now if you understand this example, you understand the finite invariant which is behind the scene, which is allowing you to reconstruct the geometry from the spectrum....Our geometric point will emerge by correlation between different frequencies. A point in the space will actually give you the correlation between the different frequencies. That is how we shall think about the point. It is not enough to give the scale [of the spectrum] but you also have to give which chords are possible."
and
"a “universal scaling system”, ... this discrete scaling manifests itself in acoustic systems, as is well known in western classical music, where the two scalings correspond, respectively, to passing to the octave (frequency ratio of 2) and transposition (the perfect fifth is the frequency ratio 3/2), with the approximate value log(3)/ log(2) ∼ 19/12 responsible for the difference between the “circulating temperament” of the Well Tempered Clavier and the “equal temperament” of XIX century music. It is precisely the irrationality of log(3)/ log(2) which is responsible for the noncommutative [complementary opposites as yin/yang] nature of the quotient corresponding to the three places {2, 3,∞}. - " Alain Connes.
So the Chinese knew the truth as did the "three gunas" philosophy of India - real music theory is infinite macroquantum energy that reverses entropy.
"...at the time of Archytas and Plato a sharp rupture occurred that fostered a shift from musical to geometrical incommensurability, so that we can find nothing about the geometric approach in the extant Pythagorean fragments as well as nothing about the musical approach in Plato or Aristotle." Math professor Luigi BorzacchiniAward-winning math teacher J.J. Asher, in his article, “The Myth of the Irrational Numbers,” pdf link here describes the problem as this:
“Irrationals are becoming numbers but they will never, for all of eternity, be numbers. Think about this: (sq rt) 2 = 1.4142135... and the integers continue on forever approaching some value but never ever reaching it. Since (sq rt) 2 will never be a number because it is in continual motion moving towards some number, it is a non-number. Since it is a non-number, it cannot be located on the number line. I conclude then that only rational numbers have a location on the line and hence only rational numbers are real numbers.”Historia Matematica listserve [HM] Music and Incommensurability, Luigi Borzacchini, Mon, 12 Jul 1999.
"...in Plato and Aristotle the reference of incommensurability becomes exclusively geometrical. The “secret of the sect”? So well kept by Archytas on the geometrical side and betrayed on the musical side,"
“A popular view is that the great discovery of Pythagoras was that there are irrational numbers, e.g., the positive square root of two. Against this it is argued that mathematics and geometry, together with their applications, do not show that there are irrational numbers or compel assent to that proposition.”
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward Philosophy 74 (2):169-176 (1999). (my emphasis).
Geometric mean = alogon as irrational number.
9/8 cubed = square root of two = Devil’s Interval tritone
5/4 = cube root of two
3/2 squared = 9/4 halved into octave as 9/8.
3/2 x 4/3 = 2 (geometric mean squared).
log(3:2×4:3)=log(2:1)
log(3:2)+log(4:3)=log(2:1)
Music theorist Jamie James points out that not only, as is well known, did Plato have a disdain for music and its uncontrollable social power, but he was hostile
“towards mousike (which it ought to be born in mind, meant any human activity governed by the Muses).”James cites researcher Cornford, who remarks how in Timaeus Plato defines the concept of the World Soul by the Pythagorean ratios but he stops at the end of the fifth octave overtone, where the overshooting comma of Pythagoras occurs – the difference between six whole tones and the octave. This is because Plato was relying on his Lambda to “contain” the comma of Pythagoras created by the difference between the natural perfect fifths and the octaves – 3 does not go into 2 evenly. According to Cornford Plato's choice of the Pythagorean Limited over the Unlimited (the prime dialectic of Pythagoras) was a reflection of Plato's perception of a closed system reality. James, Harmony of the Spheres, pp. 46-47, citing E.M. Cornford, Plato's Cosmology (London: Routledge, K. Paul, 1937).
People mistakenly claim Plato promoted music as the secret
harmony of the soul but this is not true!
“Having discarded music and gymnastics, Socrates proposes considering the science of “number and calculation” (522 C6-7)…. The link between the correct use of mathematics and the capacity of this discipline to lead to an extrasensible dimension recalls the link between the correct use of the science of harmony (of music in general) and the potential of this art to establish a contact with the soul and supersensible harmony.” Francesco Pelosi, Plato on Music, Soul and Body (Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 118.
Plato
actually promoted a new type of mathematics based on irrational magnitude – the
Greek Miracle – but the “secret” of Plato which made him so mysterious is that
he got this new type of math from music theory, from the Devil’s Interval
itself. What is the Devil’s Interval? Here’s how it’s explained from music
mathematics:
“The sound of square roots
Take two strings, one sounding an octave higher than the
other, so that their lengths are in the ratio 2:1. Then find the geometric
ratio (also called the mean proportional) between these strings, the length x
at which 2:x is the same proportion as x:1. This means that 2:x = x:1; cross-multiplying
this gives x squared =2. Thus, the “ratio” needed is √2:1 ≈ 1.414, in modern
decimals. This is close to the dissonant interval called the tritone, which
later was called the “devil in music,” namely the interval composed of three
equal whole steps each of ratio 9:8. The tritone is thus 9:8 × 9:8 × 9:8 =
729:512 ≈ 1.424.” from “Scandal of the Irrational” M.I.T. Press. pdf
link here
Economics Professor Hudson clarifies McClain’s promotion of Plato’s fake Pythagorean cover-up:
Economics Professor Michael Hudson concurs about the Devil’s Interval:
Then Borzacchini
pulls out his trump card:
“Pythagoras became the patron saint of the most anti-democratic clubs. They used the principles of musical harmony as a patina of pseudo-science to give intellectual legitimacy to a movement whose worldly consequences were anything but harmonious. The Pythagorean clubs became a network of civic cults rising above the local sphere to which most clubs related. There seems to have been some connection with the Delphi temple (the name Pythagoras means “voice of Pythia,” the snake-goddess of Delphi and its oracle). They have been likened to the Free Masons, in that they served as a kind of Council of Foreign Relations or New World Order…. Archytas [the collaborator of Plato] developed the musical scale into a political metaphor for the scales of justice. What gave music this imagery of social balance and just proportion was the ability of its mathematics of harmonic (“geometric”) proportions to serve as an analogy for how inequities of wealth and status rendered truly superior men equal in proportion to their virtue — which tended to reflect their wealth. By this circular logic the wealthy were enabled to rationalize their hereditary dominance over the rest of the population.”
Economics Professor Michael Hudson concurs about the Devil’s Interval:
“The worst problem in tuning occurs in the interval of three whole tones, e.g., between C and F#/Gb in the “natural” untempered methods of tuning. If the ratio of the octave is 2:1, then the ratio of C to F# represents the square root of two — an irrational number. (Burkert [1972:441] notes that the harmonic mean discovered in the context of Pythagorean music theory has a major use precisely in approximating the square root.)” Michael Hudson’s essay, “Music as an Analogy for Economic Order in Classical Antiquity” in Jürgen Backhaus (ed.), Karl Bücher. Theory, History, Anthropology, Non-Market Economies (Marburg:Metropolis Verlag, 2000): pp. 113-35 citing Burkert, Walter (1972), Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (Harvard University Press, 1972). So this philosophy of reality not only was the basis for the Greek Miracle creating western science but also the elite control of the technology – justified still by the logarithmic fake Pythagorean cover-up. “The necessity of tempering pure intervals, defined by the ratio of integers, is one of the great themes of Plato’s Republic. In his allegorical form, “citizens” modeled on the tones of the scale must not demand “exactly what they are owed” but must keep in mind “what is best for the city.” Ernest McClain, The Myth of Invariance: The origins of the Gods, Mathematics and Music, from the Rg Veda to Plato (Nicholas-Hays, 1976), p. 11.
"The
'demusicalization' of the theory of proportions by Plato is shocking."
(Borzacchini, p. 281 of his academic article on the topic, Incommensurability,
Music and Continuum: A Cognitive Approach) ...."...this 'removal'
seems really astonishing!"
"However, I think I can prove that in the Platonic Academy there was a trace of this earlier approach, with a tight connection between music, numerical means and similarity, and without any reference to geometric figures, such as square or pentagon." Borzacchini, again, is revealing a cover-up: "Why these silences? And why this sudden and radical change?" [hiding the secret musical origins of western science!]. "Why this sharp change? I think the first reason was that the musical proof was only negative, whereas the geometrical approach allowed the effective construction of incommensurable magnitudes."Gerald you are correct but observation does not have to be based on light alone - the true ancient Greeks taught eternal listening as the secret of reality - it is called Harmonia and in India called Nada - and in China - the truth can not be spoken but only listened to as the infinite spiral of fifths. So science assumes an external observation based on the speed of light and hence paradoxes of relativity and quantum physics that can not be unified. But noncommutative phase is the 5th dimension that is time-like and yet synchronizes all the other spacetimes of the other forces of reality - since noncommutative phase is quantum entanglement as quantum coherence as the real Harmonia of reality.
noncommutative phase means eternal time-frequency harmonization. So zero does not exist since light has relativistic mass as hidden momentum from the future! This was proven by de broglie's Law of Phase Harmony. Zero was created from geometric magnitude by Plato and Archytas and Philolaus. This is why Aristotle was against "negative infinity" zero - and noncommutative physicist Shahn Majid says Aristotle was correct.
Platonists, according to Aristotle, always posited intermediate mathematical numbers which are separate from both sensible things and the Forms. (googlebooks)
Numbers as units that are "internally comparable" but "externally incomparable."
Attic numbers favored a Cardinal Group (zero) and the myth of Number is that it was invented for the Art of War.....The alphabetical system of numbers is then internally ordered, starting around 400 BCE - but externally in-comparable. Since the alphabet is inherently ordered whereas the original Pythagorean definition of number as a group of units is not necessarily internally ordered as Cardinal Numbers (i.e. a group of pebbles) and each number has a different geometric shape. For Euclid those different shapes were all reduced to a line. In other words for Plato and Archytas a "unit" of number is redefined as an indeterminate form as Apeiron or irrational magnitude of the line as the Greek Miracle of the continuum. That is the say, as Aristotle understood but disagreed with, the Forms are based on the void of irrational geometry as indeterminate form of Apeiron or Alogon (irrational magnitude as the internal ordinal number that is odd-even at the same time).
So what Plato realized is that prime numbers have to be cardinal since the prime numbers are not generated by 2 and 3 multiples or division. And so Form Numbers also do not have multiplication nor addition but instead have inherent monistic identity of "twoness" or "threeness" but are not cardinal as an external order tied to geometry. This means that Form Numbers are non-comparable units while non-comparable numbers are indeterminate form (alogon as irrational magnitude). And so the non-comparable indetermine numbers within the Forms are ordinate internal numbers of the Void within form while the Form Numbers are cardinal as external number. Aristotle says this can not be true since the number 2 is not unique to any particular form and so Form Numbers can not exist. Form Numbers contradicts number as a comparable unit non-differentiated abstraction.
As Aristotle points out you can have two units come into existence at the same time and therefore are not "non-comparable units." Yes this is the secret of noncommutative phase!
Also Aristotle states the concept of Form Numbers implies "equalization of unequals" which conflicts with "non-comparability" of units.
Aristotle then points out that "ordinary" mathematicians do not use this concept of "indefinite dyad" (irrational magnitude) since it is assumed that all units are comparable as number. Not that some units are comparable as number and other units as number are not-comparable.
For example adding one unit to another is always 2 but this is not the case with indefinite dyad (since then 2 is actually the geometric mean squared!!).
If every 2 unit makes 2 then Forms can not be numbers if indefinite dyad is supposed to be a number.
Aristotle defines number as Order without geometric position. And so Number is countable but not necessarily measurable.
Aristotle does recognize that magnitudes are not-discrete units and so can not be counted.
And so Aristotle states that matter is the infinite potential of the parts that make up a form that is actualized as magnitude.
And so the infinite potential is "intelligible matter" versus sensible matter as magnitude form.
Number is then an indefinite infinite potential that is made definite by the form as sensible substance.
And so substance as form does not exist in actuality since it can never be reduced to one and so the one exists only as potentiality (this is the secret of light as consciousness as eternal motion).
"no unit in the number 2 exists in actuality."That is the Indian definition of Maya!!
And so Aristotle complains there is no analogy of the Soul (Light) for individual things. But this is what the Pre-Socratics as with the Daoist and Indians knew to be the truth - all is light based on time as relativistic mass from noncommutative phase (the 3-in-1 unity).
What Plato did was used dialectics to put Form over the cardinal order of number so as to create Form Number that covers up the indeterminate form of irrational magnitude. Dialectics views Number Forms as the basic unit of reality covering up the secret of indeterminate form as irrational magnitude number (no longer Cardinal number).
Aristotle believes is it the Soul (as light) that unifies a composite of sensible forms into counting numbers as order without position. So units as magnitude form have position as so are not intelligible matter. While the counting soul of light transforms inanimate actual matter into potential intelligible matter. Therefore Monodic number is abstract number that is not a number of actual concrete units with sensible substance but number as the order or time of light.
Or to put it another way a physical triangle as Kepler understood "collapses" into an "intelligible" triangle of light as intelligible matter by the counting of light.
And so Number as intelligible matter is the Process of counting versus that which we count.
And so the formal aspect of the process of counting means the ORDER of counting aka the direction of time of light as the soul.
Turning the light around as meditation therefore means reversing the order of counting time.
Aristotle then concludes that time is impossible if the Soul (Light) does not exist!!
A single unit does not qualify as a number and yet a number one is indivisible. And so the number one is not a number of units as sensible substance or inanimate matter but rather the number one is intelligible matter as the order of time of light as the soul.
And so by counting with intelligible number then no new forms as substance are created. This is the secret of turning the light around into the Emptiness as reverse time energy. And so Aristotle defines Number as inherently Cardinal based on the order of time - not just a heap or substance that is sensible.
It was when the Attic alphabet arose that Number aligned with a Form as the phonic symbol enabled Number to no longer be inherently Cardinal but instead be just a "heap" of "substance" , as both integers and geometric units combined.
John J. Cleary, "Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Form Numbers," in
Platon und Aristoteles, sub ratione veritatis: Festschrift für Wolfgang Wieland zum 70. Geburtstag
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2003
So we find that what Plato did is argue that the idea of "two-ness" or "pairness" is a symmetric or ordinal set before it splits into 2 numbers and so it is not indefinite nor is it cardinal.
To make this argument he claims that we consider eyes and legs and arms to be an equal set of two-ness or pairness BEFORE we count them as number and so the Dyad does not need to be Cardinal before it turns into Number - nor after it is a Form.
But Plato is WRONG to make this assumption - as nonwestern culture emphasizes - that there is no equal "pairness" as a non-ordered reality - for example for males the left hand is yang and right hand is yin, etc.
The author of that article instead favors Plato and claims Aristotle's argument is sophistry! Hilarious!
I am now reading this academic promoting Plato who argued that "two-ness" is before number as time, so for example two eyes is before an order of the eyes, same for arms and legs. Aristotle disagreed, arguing that the order of time is inherent to reality. Aristotle was correct and this is the truth of Music theory! So if 1 is C and 2 is C as octave then 3 is G as Perfect Fifth overtone but at the same time 3 is F as Perfect Fifth undertone! It is the same pitch but different frequency with 2/3 and 3/2. So because of this ancient truth of number and time it was known that for males the left hand is yang and right hand is yin while upper body is yang and lower body is yin! The left eye is the sun and right eye is the moon. In other words the order of time is inherent to ecological harmony and the ancients KNEW this. So Plato brainwashed all of us to think that material reality is just a heap of objects that can be jumbled around as inherent "ordinal" or exchangeable "sets" of numbers. This was from the Attic alphabet of lining each number with a letter and so it was easy to then take it a next step and argue that the order of letters doesn't really matter. But yes it does since it changes the geometry in time as a 5th dimension - what Aristotle called "potential" matter that is "intelligible" and is based on Order NOT position! haha. So for example this basic exercise - of "moving of yin and yang" is from the secret of how the legs and arms are NOT the same - your left hand is different than your right hand, etc. Plato was wrong!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WD4skv5Z5I As brainwashed WEsterners we look at that Chinese man and think - oh how stupid he is just waving his hands around! When in fact his third eye is fully open, he has transcended death and knows the truth of reality - and he does long distance healing, etc. He trained at Shaolin. The secret? It is the same as licking a 9 volt battery just by holding your left hand facing your lower body and right hand facing your upper body - as a male - the secret of complementary opposites as the truth of reality!! Hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BOhx6J21AY&list=PLaxpujmz7Q05Al4uskLGTbkAojSMPwagg&index=2 I made this Playlist last night - 77 different recordings of the same Adagio of Ravel. Why? Because it is Phrygian Mode - Phrygian is the secret of the lament as blues music from Anatolia before the Plato lie. Phrygian uses syncopated rhythm and frequency time inversion for right brain trance dominance as internal chills or tingling - the vagus nerve neutralizes your free radicals by increasing dopamine. It is healing music. enjoy.
I am now reading this academic promoting Plato who argued that "two-ness" is before number as time, so for example two eyes is before an order of the eyes, same for arms and legs. Aristotle disagreed, arguing that the order of time is inherent to reality. Aristotle was correct and this is the truth of Music theory! So if 1 is C and 2 is C as octave then 3 is G as Perfect Fifth overtone but at the same time 3 is F as Perfect Fifth undertone! It is the same pitch but different frequency with 2/3 and 3/2. So because of this ancient truth of number and time it was known that for males the left hand is yang and right hand is yin while upper body is yang and lower body is yin! The left eye is the sun and right eye is the moon. In other words the order of time is inherent to ecological harmony and the ancients KNEW this. So Plato brainwashed all of us to think that material reality is just a heap of objects that can be jumbled around as inherent "ordinal" or exchangeable "sets" of numbers. This was from the Attic alphabet of lining each number with a letter and so it was easy to then take it a next step and argue that the order of letters doesn't really matter. But yes it does since it changes the geometry in time as a 5th dimension - what Aristotle called "potential" matter that is "intelligible" and is based on Order NOT position! haha. So for example this basic exercise - of "moving of yin and yang" is from the secret of how the legs and arms are NOT the same - your left hand is different than your right hand, etc. Plato was wrong!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WD4skv5Z5I As brainwashed WEsterners we look at that Chinese man and think - oh how stupid he is just waving his hands around! When in fact his third eye is fully open, he has transcended death and knows the truth of reality - and he does long distance healing, etc. He trained at Shaolin. The secret? It is the same as licking a 9 volt battery just by holding your left hand facing your lower body and right hand facing your upper body - as a male - the secret of complementary opposites as the truth of reality!! Hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BOhx6J21AY&list=PLaxpujmz7Q05Al4uskLGTbkAojSMPwagg&index=2 I made this Playlist last night - 77 different recordings of the same Adagio of Ravel. Why? Because it is Phrygian Mode - Phrygian is the secret of the lament as blues music from Anatolia before the Plato lie. Phrygian uses syncopated rhythm and frequency time inversion for right brain trance dominance as internal chills or tingling - the vagus nerve neutralizes your free radicals by increasing dopamine. It is healing music. enjoy.
" noncommutative phase means eternal time-frequency harmonization. So zero does not exist since light has relativistic mass as hidden momentum from the future! This was proven by de broglie's Law of Phase Harmony. Zero was created from geometric magnitude by Plato and Archytas and Philolaus. This is why Aristotle was against "negative infinity" zero - and noncommutative physicist Shahn Majid says Aristotle was correct."
ReplyDelete----"So zero does not exist...":
One could say this but as far as actual numeric value "zero" is the only number that exists. So this statement requires "tense" as in time to exist as a plane that defines attitude or vector. This is not accurate as i understand. The visible / physical manifestation is more of a condensation of echoes of the actual momentum. This is a temporary state to various degrees dependent upon the degree of harmony experienced by all other states.
Another way of saying this: All states of any portion of Universe experience one "unit" of time concomitantly but each experiences this unit in a complexity of states. In a "unified" state -no time and oneness & no self. Outside of that various degrees of fractal creating a "pull" in seconds and minutes. So becoming more rooted in the physical which becomes the archetypal ego. So i personally would tend to think that the purveyors of "unit" thinking firmly believed in "unit" thinking. It certainly leads to physical control over what one physically fears.
yes Alain Connes explains that music theory has a "geometric dimension of zero" but it still has time-frequency momentum as the 5th dimension! So this is before any vector - instead it's a "spinor" as Eddie Oshins points out (I quote both on my current blog).
Delete