Does Eric Dollard know the secret of Music as the Aether from Pythagoras? He claims to.

Music composer interviews Eric Dollard but the secret is not revealed.

So I emailed that composer to tell him the secret.

Then I discover Eric made a 4 hour lecture - on music and the ether.

He gives this interview but the sound quality is ironically bad

So I slowed it down from 2x.

He gives another talk based on his DVD

Another Eric Dollard talk on Pythagoras, music and the Aether

And another one

"Chords have the affect of materializations in space depending on planetary alignments.".....

15 or 18000 pipes in church organs - as electrical capacitors with a copper roof...the church was a transformer to God up till the time of Bach....

o.k. so "not necessarily tones but ratios" -

I'm back up to 2x -

"specific shapes" as ratios - become more complicated - on the oscilloscope as an electrical field.

There is something polarizing space and music works through that polarization by adding on top of it.

So far so good.

He says today music is bad since it doesn't tap into those harmonics. Yep.

He says music is based on vertical time zones around Earth and that is what creates the specific music ratios for those areas, they are not all Pythagorean.

Somebody asked him about the chord D Minor. He says Bach favored "D minor" a lot - I gotta call B.S. on that. I memorized Bach's Italian Concerto in F Major - he says it's the same thing but shifted in phase (he means enharmonic). But to say Bach favored D Minor - Bach didn't favor anything in tuning - that's why he wrote pieces for all the keys.

Now he's saying the sound of the Aurora Borealis is the same sound as deep sea animals. The wavelengths so long and the velocities so high... he says.

This is interesting - it is similar to Puharich talking about the ELF subharmonic as the proton-electron magnetic moment precession as the aether energy.

So now he is getting into the noncommutative phase secret of the Ether. He doesn't say the term noncommutative phase but he says if one line of space goes one way and the other line goes the other way, that's the secret to polarize the Aether energy.

So far no evidence that Dollard doesn't understand the natural harmonics. He just says it's ratios but I think he understands.

Now he is referencing Jamie Jamison's book Music of the Spheres - that I cite in my master's thesis.

Now the interviewer is trying talk about Feng Shui. Dollard doesn't really understand.

Eric goes into depth about Pythagorean mathematics and how it is key to understanding the natural science that is hidden in this day and age as well as much in depth discussion on various musical scales using the real Pythagorean ratios, which were accompanied with a few audio samples that were put together by Seattle Music Composer Charles Roland Berry. This allowed everyone to hear the difference between the ancient musical scales and today’s common scales. Eric even covers a fair amount about Gustav LeBon and covers many comparisons showing the mirror images between some of the music of Bach and polyphase power systems with many examples using his Versor Algebra diagrams.

O.K. someone posts a comment. a summary of Eric's presentation at the recent 2015 Energy Science & Technology Conference, Eric Dollard, The Power of the Aether as Related to Music and Electricity

So Most of what Dollard said what not about music as much - and the quality of the sound was so bad no one could understand him. haha. I will switch to the other recordings.

Oh no - it's another "live call" with terrible sound quality.

Even when I recorded over a phone with Jim Nance I got better quality!! haha.

 Oh No - he just said "Pythagoras and Plato" - he grouped them together! So he really doesn't understand the secret!!

Now in this 2nd link - he is mainly just talking about his next book on J.J. Thomson electrical research. Great but that's not a music secret. haha.

So now he's talking about how the Earth becomes a music instrument via Tesla.

O.K. now he's talking about the natural harmonics of Keyser - I know that research - so it is the natural harmonics as the Pythagorean Lambdoma.

So now someone calls in and asks about a 2/3 harmonic as the slope ratio of Marconi - and so Eric Dollard says the "counterspace" has to be geometric divisions - as linear  and the harmonics are hyperbolic as logarithmic exponential....

Hmm - I'm not sure if that is real noncommutative phase - I don't think so.

I think Eric Dollard calls noncommutative phase an inverse induction current  - as the other references to that term are in the 19th  Century. haha. Around J.J. Thomson's time I think.

"How the Ether Polarizes....Forms of Induction and how they rise out of the Ether."

But just because an octave doubles does not mean it "squares" as an exponential logarithm. This is the "bait and switch" that Archytas did. Dollard groups Plato and Archytas - so maybe he doesn't really understand noncommutative phase.

Obviously Alain Connes says logarithms are contained within noncommutative phase but the ancients only used natural harmonics which are noncommutative phase.

Another thing that Dollard emphasizes is that energy needs to be transcended. So just as the Quantum Force is not "energy" in the traditional sense - this is true - it is phase momentum energy that is a new type of energy as phonon force.

So then he admits he does not have "absolute authority" in the realm of sound - not like his electrical research.

Dollard says "meditate while your in the bushes" - about Walter Russell and John Keely. He says Keely info is "random noise" - but that's not true at all!  Keely discovered the secret of ultrasound and Dale Pond says he told this secret to Andrija Puharich and then Stan Meyer's water engine was bsed on Puharich!

So Dollard says "power" is different than "energy" because "power" is recycled back into the source that it came from and that is what Tesla did.

So Dollard says Bach was not as sophisticated as equal-tempered polyphony. So the harmonics he studied of Bach could not be held for long - since otherwise the music would go out of tune. Yes Bach did spread out this harmonics in the counterpoint - as he did not use equal-tempered fully - just a close approximation aka "well-tempered."

So then Dollard says when he set up to antennas that were phase coherent in 180 degrees - the electrical wave traveled around the Earth and created stereophonic sound in his room even though the sound was transmitted monophonic.

So Dollard is trying to create a Tesla Earth free energy system.

He keeps saying he needs money.

Now Dollard says he wants to make a chorus to produce his special music.

Then create a music-television. It recreates the 180 phase form - and then music would create the visual forms of the t.v.

He says it has to be early form music harmonics - so at least he does want to use the natural harmonics.

So that is the noncommutative phase secret - he calls it a "push-pull" power.

O.K. that other link is the same podcast with the bad audio. haha.

O.K. here he does a music interview

So he says it starts in the 1500s with polyphonic music with Vivaldi as Pythagorean Modal Music as part of the church modes. He said the music was made harsh when logarithmic.

So he says he ate just fruits and vegetables and hiked in nature for 2 weeks before this pipe organ concert on a planetary alignment with solar flares - and just one spot in the church caused several pipe organs to resonate together. He said the church was going to come apart - in 1980 - and he left his body - as a spiritual experience and he could see the music as visual forms....

So then he says Bach uses a "backward time cycle" fit together - and so the Bach music would never end - noncommutative phase secret.

Now he talks about ultrasonics - as a vortex between two speakers of sound and how he used it to heal people. So he does understand the secret.

Here is Dollard talking about Farnsworth Fusion - tabletop fusion? I think this is what a coworker told me about....

So in this vid - he says how Fransworth's Fusor had tapped into "virtual electrons" as "Dirac's Sea" that Dollard calls "counterspace" of the "aether." O.K. but as I have quoted - from the biography of Dirac - this is directly from Heaviside that Dirac realized was noncommutative math! So Eric Dollard is an expert on Steinmetz who used the term "wattless power" to refer to the noncommutative math of Heaviside. That is my understanding.

How come Dollard doesn't use the term "noncommutative phase." He says the vortex is "polarized" and then he says 180 degrees phase - but that is not the same as noncommutative! Noncommutative just means like in division - the same numbers are switched for the denominator and numerator - and so you get a different geometric value. But for listening in perception - what I call the Hempel Effect - is that this phase shift that is noncommutative is still heard as the Perfect Fifth - even though in one case it is subharmonic C to F and the other case it is C to G overtone, so with different frequency and amplitude values. This is from Droscher's book "Magic of the Senses" but I also cited an updated version of this phenomenon. http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2017/08/deep-sighs-on-mountain-tops-are-heard.html

Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society

https://books.google.com/books?id=4qQ-AQAAIAAJ

1901 - ‎Mathematics

... EI cos w, and the second the author calls the ' 'wattless power," or EI sin to. ... but is unattractive, except to those versed in non-commutative algebra, 1901.

A geometric algebra reformulation and interpretation of Steinmetz's ...

https://www.researchgate.net/.../269468849_A_geometric_algebra_reformulation_and_i...

Non-commutative power algebra ·Geometric algebra · ... power or wattless power is not yet mentioned. 2. ... hypothesis of a noncommutative power algebra.

Full text of "Vectors and vector diagrams, applied to the alternating ...

https://archive.org/stream/cu31924003910464/cu31924003910464_djvu.txt

Products 168 - 183 - ... which on multiplication by C/ gives the wattless power of circuit 80 Y, ...... definite line of action, while the vector product is non-commutative, ...

Full text of "Vectors And Vector Diagrams" - Internet Archive

https://archive.org/stream/in.../2015.162419.Vectors-And-Vector-Diagrams_djvu.txt

Products 168 - 183 - ... which on multiplication by 0/ gives the wattless power of circuit 80 y, ...... definite line of action, while the vector product is non-commutative, ...

O.K. so my previous blogpost gives a link to Dollard posting on a forum - wherein someone asks him about noncommutative quaternions of Steinmetz.

Dollard calls these "versors." But then Dollard makes the same point as Juliana Mortenson!! The problem of Planck was hiding the term of "seconds" in his constant.

1) Energy; Joules, or Planck per Second

(2) Activity, or Power; Watt, or Planck per Second Square.

Here we have arrived at eight principle dimensional relations for the understanding of Electrical Theory and Practice. All other dimensional relations are developed from consideration of the Metallic-Dielectric Geometry and the Aether with which it is engaged.

In our effort to cleanse the system of units and dimensions, a foremost extraneous element is the “Bogo”, and its arbitrary powers of ten. The Bogo, bs, is entwined with most electrical units. Its function is to involve all electrical relations with “charge carriers” and E equals mc squared, the pathogens injected by Physics. With lawyer like skill the Bogo has been contrived in such a manner as to simply cancel itself out within most dimensional combinations, remaining itself occult. The Bogo however continues to lurk as a mischievous spirit.

Three primary dimensions make up the Bogo,

(1) Mass, m, Gram

(2) Charge, q, “Coulomb”

(3) Numeric, b, 4*pi*10^-9

A principle dimensional relation in the makeup of the Bogo is given as,

Gram per “Coulomb square”, s.

The “Coulomb” here has an adulterated meaning, it is “charge” rather that Total Dielectric Induction. Hence the quotation marks on Coulomb. This is what Steinmetz refers to as a “Prehistoric Concept”. This relation, s, is the significant pathogen so its removal is of primary importance. This factor s is the “Seed of Confusion”.

So I look up Versor - it is from Hamilton's quaternions. But to me it looks just like a Bloch Sphere! So I google Versor and Bloch Sphere - bingo. 2014 pdf

Dear Dr. Robbins: Did you notice Eric Dollard's 2015 music talk? He says his term "counterspace" that you also use refers to what Farnsworth discovered as "virtual electrons" from "Dirac's Sea." I quote on my blog how Dirac discovered that quantum physics was the same as Heaviside's noncommutative phase math. So then Dollard states on a forum that the problem is Planck's use of "seconds" in his constant for Joules. This is exactly the same point that Dr. Juliana Mortenson Brooks makes about Planck's Constant! So Planck used Wien's Law to convert the "seconds" into energy density. So as Juliana points out this messed up De Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony critique of relativity. Because in quantum physics the energy is based on frequency, not amplitude, and so the mass and momentum of light kept changing for de Broglie since he had that hidden "seconds" measurement that is not a real constant. But de Broglie understood that there is an ether as a reverse time field that guides light - and so this reverse time is the phase field - the phase wave or pilot wave as he called it, from the future! So it was hidden in Planck's Constant since the noncommutative phase is Sub-Planckian - or "sub-wavelength" of light as it's called in metamaterial science. I blog on this as well.

Any comments or questions would be appreciated,

thanks,

drew

Spinors as Quaternion equivalents on a Bloch Sphere Spinor: https://www.quora.com/What-is-spin-1-2

 Spin-1/2 also has a close connection with the quaternion numbers. You can represent a spinor in 3 dimensions with the 3 complex matrices famously known as the Pauli matrices. These matrices represent the Lie group SU(2) which is a double covering of the ordinary rotation group in 3 dimensions SO(3). But you can also represent the same group by the set of unit quaternions. Quaternions are similar to complex numbers (pairs of numbers where you have one real number and one imaginary), but where the numbers are 4-dimensional instead of 2-dimensional--so instead of just the two independent directions 1 and i, you also have two more called j and k. Using two copies of the quaternions, or two copies of SU(2) or the Pauli matrices, you can represent SO(3,1), the group of rotations in 4-dimensions that's used in special relativity (Minkowski space). They are ordinary 3-dimensional rotations plus Lorentz boosts.

 But for spin representations (those we label by 1/2 integer spins), you have an additional Clifford Algebra structure--a set of "anticommutation relations" such as ab = -ba. Roughly speaking, this is the reason why fermions anticommute and bosons commute--although to really prove the spin-statistics theorem requires relativity and a lot less handwaving and more math. This theorem is then what leads to the statement that fermions obey the Pauli exclusion principle while bosons do not.

 We can think of the electron as having two spin components, one defining orientation and the other direction of motion. Each fold or twist folds one of these components. Half way through the cycle both potentials are reverse such that they are equivalent to a vertual positron and then reversed again to manifest an electron after one cycle having spin 360 degrees in both a lateral (electric) and transverse (magnetic) plane.

 

  Imagine the particle had a point on its surface. (It can’t, but just leave that for the moment.) Now, imagine it has two degrees of freedom, and apply the Uncertainty Principle. One variable will be radial motion, and there will be motion pulsating “in and out” so it cannot have a surface - if it did, it would have a precise radial distance and zero radial momentum, and that is not allowed. Similarly, it cannot have precise radial orientation, otherwise it would have zero angular momentum at the same time. Now, let us take that angular uncertainty and argue there has to be a wave function associated with the motion, such as it is. Let us argue that the point starts at a node. There are no more nodes until the rotation is complete, but a wave period requires two nodes, therefore it takes two rotations to complete a wave period. That indicates spin = 1/2.

 Spin 1/2 in Hilbert Space - awesome vid youtube

Dollard discussing Versors and Music theory

 Another versor system of antiquity is that developed by Pythagoras of Ancient Greece (570 – 495 B.C.) This system is called “Music”. It is based upon the HARMONIC SUBDIVSIONS of an oscillating string, two to one, two to three, four to five, and etc. Each subdivision represents a versor position. This developed into a base seven versor,
(3)

It is however than n is a fractional and sometimes complex quantity. Therefore music represents a most complex versor system.

Why does Eric use the 7th root of 1 - because 9/8 as six whole tones does not equal an octave as 7 - from Plato. But 9/8 is from 3/2 squared to 9/4 and halved into the octave as the major 2nd 9/8 based on Archytas using "arithmetic mean (3/2) x harmonic mean (4/3) = 2. What Dollard doesn't realize is that 1 is the Versor as noncommutative phase because 3 is G as overtone Perfect Fifth, at the same time that 3 is F as the undertone Perfect fifth. So G=3=F at the same time as the nonlocal ether. This is the secret of Daoist alchemy and the three gunas in India as well. I did my masters thesis on sound-current nondualism and so have researched this since high school, and I memorized Bach's Italian Concerto in F - my channel has all the free research.