At first he used virtual photons
The evanescent modes and tunneling violate the theory of special relativity, obviously, they represent the exception which proves the special theory of relativity. We demonstrate the quantum mechanical behavior of evanescent modes {with digital microwave} signals at a macroscopic scale of the order of a meter and show that evanescent modes are well described by virtual photons as predicted by former QED calculations.But
then it was claimed his virtual wave could not be a signal, only random |
Then, now that it is established on the dual theoretical and experimental base that Time is a derived concept of Physics, the superluminal speed of the experiments developed on Tunnel-effect, has to be moved from the paradox rank to that of unavoidable effect. We cannot calculate any speed, where no Time evolution exists.Now notice that first image I posted? And what precisely does it model? Noncommutative phase as the 5th dimension!!
Notice the incoming signal - our string if you will - a line - consider that to be "1" - the root tonic. Notice then it is reflected equally - consider that to be then "2" - the octave. Half the wavelength is double the frequency. But wait!! There is suddenly a "zero time" (fifth dimension) quantum nonlocal tunnel!! And then what emerges - the same wavelength now split into thirds but going in the opposite direction - i.e. noncommutative phase. This is the "red line" as 2 opposite direction phase waves that are superluminal signals and therefore noncommutative phase!
The physics community has thrown up every known barrier to try to stop this experimental result but Nimtz, et. al. have answered back in detail why each explanation is not valid.
Thus the superluminal (FTL) transmission velocity increases with barrier length. This strange behavior is called the Hartman effect, which was confirmed in several experiments....Evanescent optical modes with their imaginary momentum are strange particles....Evanescent and tunneling modes are virtual particles. They are observed in electromagnetic, elastic fields, and they appear also at macroscopic extensions....The tunneling process seems to represent an exception of special theory of relativity.
Guenter Nimtz, et. al., 2015, Zero time tunneling: macroscopic experiments with virtual particles.
...direct sound from a source interferes with a strong reflection from a hard surface....Thus, the superluminal acoustic effect we have described is likely a ubiquitous but imperceptible phenomenon in the everyday world.2007, "Sound beyond the Speed of Light," WM Robertson, et. al.
When one experimenter, Raymond Chiao, said that it didn't matter if it was superluminal because you could never send a signal this way, only random photons, he was wrong. To demonstrate this graphically, another physicist, Günter Nimtz sent a recording of Mozart's 40th symphony over four times light speed. And for your entertainment you can listen to that superluminal Mozart here. There's a lot of hiss, but it's hard to deny there's a signal. Superluminal Sound
Zero-Time Tunneling – Revisited
Abstract
Since 1931, the nonclassical process of tunneling was conjectured to have a zero-time delay in the barrier. These theories have been rejected and denied. However, photonic and recent electronic tunneling experiments have proven the zero-time prediction. Tunneling is due to virtual wave packets in electromagnetic, elastic, and Schrödinger wave fields up to the macroscopic level. In this article we cite theoretical and experimental studies on zero-time tunneling, which have proven this striking behavior.Alexander Carôt gives youtube talk about his work with Guenter Nimtz on superluminal sound.
creates a passive dielectric medium with a negative group delay time due to polarization shift. A rotational strain of the polarization vector by one of the adaptors is coupled with a drastic negative group velocity.So this is the same "metamaterial" secret of Sir John Pendry!
So he says that if you tunneled sound 1 kilometer you would only have 150 kilohertz bandwidth. It has to be a sine-wave signal and can not be a digital square wave!! Further corroboration of my claim.
Nimtz talking in English, being interviewed about his superluminal signals
thanks. I found his posts on the forum where he talks about versors and then links to his music analysis saying the mode is the 7th root of 1. But actually the first logarithmic equation was Perfect Fifth plus Perfect Fourth = Octave from Archtyas using Arithmetic Mean x Harmonic mean = geometric mean squared. This means Archytas covered up the noncommutative phase as ARithmetic mean has to be 3/2 as the Perfect Fifth or C to G overtone harmonic but 2/3 as Perfect Fifth is C to F subharmonic. This 2/3 got covered up and so the noncommutative phase was lost and instead symmetric math was from the wrong music theory! So Dollard is still using symmetric math from Plato and Archytas as the first square root is from Archytas using the wrong music theory! Real Pythagorean harmonics is noncommutative phase that is asymmetric. There is a Greek electrical engineer who figured this out - using ancient Greek projective geometry. So what Dollard calls the "counterspace" from Dirac's Quantum Sea of virtual particles - Dionysios G Raftopoulos calls it the Quantum Undertone based on the asymmetric harmonics. He came to the same conclusion I did - only I used music theory and he used the actual Greek ratios of geometry. http://ecoechoinvasives.blogspot.com/2018/01/dionysios-g-raftopoulos-asymmetric.html I blogged on his book - it's a free download but he also critiques relativity. So I wish Dollard luck - when dealing with quantum relativity there's gonna be paradoxes. For example Guenter Nimtz has demonstrated superluminal sound signals - of Mozart - but the other physicists are in denial that special relativity speed of light signal limit could be violated! The trick was he used quantum tunneling as the ether - as imaginary momentum from reverse phase - so noncommutative phase. I blogged on that as well. The problem is that Dirac got hung up on his symmetric math model as well - even though he realized the noncommutative math of quantum physics was from Heaviside who got it originally from Poisson. So the Poisson Bracket converts quantum back into the symmetric math for position and momentum - and so the relativity takes prominence over the quantum ether that is noncommutative. The only physics course I ever took was quantum physics and my professor said everyone should take quantum physics first or else they get brainwashed by the wrong foundation of reality - the symmetric math classical physics.
No comments:
Post a Comment