Now considering the email I sent Professor Myers was titled
“asymmetry and the ecological crisis” — or to that effect — and that I
sent the email just a couple days ago — I’d like to suggest it may have
influenced the subject of this blog entry.
On that note let’s proceed with what I recommended to Professor Myers
and see if he is able to consider this top of asymmetry at an
appropriate level of understanding.
The cosmology book by astronomer Frank Close — The Lucifer Principle —
details how asymmetry has been traced all the way back to the creation
of neutrinos close to the Planck time limit of 10 to the minus 34
seconds or so. Asymmetry starts with the very beginning of the
universe!
“Nature has conspired against us” writes astronomer Frank Close.
Nature has a left-hand directed asymmetry — through the now unified 3 fields of energy — weak, strong and electromagnetic.
But gravity is the real puzzle because Newton got his inverse-square
law by converting the previous foundation of Pythagorean resonance in
water energy as intensity into iron-based density measurements.
Newton realized that the in tensity of the string is doubled by
increasing the weight 4 times on the end of the string. Newton got his
law of gravity directly from the Law of Pythagoras and Newton knew that
Galileo and Bournelli were wrong when they attributed the Law of
Pythagoras as an incorrect myth of hammer weight changing frequency.
The problem with Newton’s law of gravity though is that it’s based on
a logarithmic measurement which cuts off the alchemical resonance of
energy. Newton was an alchemist above all else — which is why his
shoulder-length hair was completely white by the age of 40: too much
mercury.
Anyway Pythagorean resonance is premised on no symbol for infinity —
the nonlocal consciousness can not be contained by a Number and also
Number resonates as complimentary opposites. The energy is based on the
quantum properties of water as the Female principle — which is why
Newton could not measure the cycles of the Moon properly and also why
the Pythagoreans refused to bath in the communal Greek baths: water is
too strong a conductor of energy as information.
Hence the joke among the Greeks: “the dirty Pythagoreans.”
Anyway when the ultraviolet catastrophe arose in the black box
experiments of quantum mechanics science once again confronted the fact
that energy intensity is tied to frequency — not to the amplitude as
density vectors. The equipartition principle had been violated.
Aristotelian logic no longer ruled. Science got psychedelic.
The latest unified field science demonstrates that discrete numbers
are really the basis for science and these discrete numbers are exactly
the same alchemical numbers used by Pythagorean alchemists.
The 5-D model of relativity uses discrete numbers (see astronomer
Paul Wesson’s article in a recent New Scientist journal, posted on
http://breakingopenthehead.com) and is the most accurate demonstration of a unified field theory incorporating gravity.
John Wheeler argues that black holes are governed by discrete numbers
only — no real Number continuum — because “It comes from Bit.”
Everything exists within a black hole.
The new plasma energy technologies also utilize the discrete number information in lasers.
Most importantly the Riemann Hypothesis — applicable to ALL ARENAS OF
SCIENCE (just read “Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis) is based on
discrete numbers.
What does this have to do with asymmetry?
Well science is converting left-hand directed carbon-based molecules
into right-hand directed silica-based molecules through the nanotech
revolution — all centered on the discrete number principles of the Bucky
Ball and the Buckfullerene.
The computers are in control (just as Professor Steve Strogatz, an
expert in quantum chaos) — through discrete numbers — only the left-hand
directed discrete number asymmetry of Nature is now reversed into a
right-handed directed asymmetry.
What causes this reversal? Well in quantum chaos terms it’s the
“ghost resonance” of “hidden coherence” — the nonlocal consciousness of
the formless 4th dimension of space.
Silica is supposedly a symmetrical molecule but it is postulated that
life evolved from right-hand directed asymmetrical crystallization of
silica. Read Professor Cairn-Smith’s recent book “Evolving the Mind.”
Or just google the topic.
Right-hand directed asymmetry in the silica molecules are found in
the brain — as Mad Cow Disease, as syphillis and increasingly as
DNA-silica biochips.
Silica-DNA biochips are THE technology of the future — just read
“Nanotechnology and Homeland Security” (2005) — by the leading
scientists in the field.
Why is it that 96% of the universe is unknown — Dark Matter and Dark
Energy? Read professor Michael Disney’s book “the Hidden Universe” —
the Iceberg Effect is caused by the incorrect left-brain logic of
phonetic axioms that created Western Civilizaton and ALSO created the
ecological crisis.
In otherwords the reason science can not understand the Cosmos is
because it’s a reflection of the fact that humans are destroying
left-hand directed carbon-based molecules on Earth.
We have to really increasingly on the Artificial Life of the
charge-coupled devices to give us an “accurate” reading of cosmology.
But do those CCD’s really care about “science”?
The water that makes up 60% of humans’ — our body and mind — is the
pivot point for the transistion to the new right-hand directed
silica-based molecules for Earth — through apocalyptic fire and metal
technology.
The water crisis is much worse than the oil crisis and water is the
focus of new nanowater engineering at Sandia Labs. The new energy
revolution is premised on nanowater.
Just as NASA engineers — Dr. Robert Jastrow and the recent books
“Privileged Planet” (endorsed by many top scientists) and “Biocosm” (by
Yale-trained lawyer James Gardner and the book won a top science book of
the year award by Discover magazine) —
The Future of Evolution on Earth is right-hand directed silica-based molecules.
drew hempel, MA
Well I’m just hoping that You Torbjorn Larsson keep up with your
reading of the journal
Nature since it has featured at least two
articles in the past 5 years on how silica from soybeans combined with
prions is crucial to the construction on nanobiomotors.
Also syphillis is caused by prions as well — well spirochetes with the wrong asymmetry — right-hand directed.
In fact cancer it self has as its main cause the loss of the
symmetrical tetrahedral geometry of the water molecules which then
throws out of whack the time cycles of the mitrochondria.
The crucial key here is the 4th dimension of space as the guiding
nonlocal pilot wave of quantum chaos creating a universal form of life.
These are different names for it:
The twisted scroll ring (read “Sync” by professor Steve Strogatz)
The Klein Bottle (read “Topologies of the Flesh” by professor emeritus Steven M. Rosen)
The Double Torus (read Ralph Abraham’s quantum chaos books)
The “cycloid-spiral spacetime motion” (read books on Victor
Schauberger, the Austrian forester who designed plasma vortex aircraft
for classified miltary projects in the U.S. and Germany)
And there there’s the Buckyballs (read “Hacking Matter” a free online
book on quantum dots and nanotech) — the equilateral Triangle is the
MOST symmetric and therefore the MOST efficient transducer of energy.
OK — I had a very close encounter with a totally flat, equilaterlateral black triangle aircraft.
It was preceded by spheres of plasma doing inexplicable manuevers on the horizon — each sphere was a different color.
That was summer of 1997. It was in a military test corridor which
had a UFO flap in the 1970s and had cattle mutilation — so scary that
the rancher adjacent to the state wildlife refuge moved out of the area.
So science is much stranger than people give it credit. The Manhattan Project was bad enough.
Positronium anti-matter technology — for propulsion and for vaporization — is top secret.
Project HAARP — plasma laser transformation of the planet through extremely low frequency is top secret.
Underground cities — top secret.
Just the effects of depleted uranium are bad enough.
Scott — have you tried googling my name “drew hempel”?
I have posed as my virtual identities online. People have posted using my name for example.
Do not be alarmed Scott — this is all for fun!
As I stated I got the U of Minnesota to join the Workers Rights
Consortium which entailed meeting 9 times over a year in very lengthy
heated discussions.
Before that I got the U of Minnesota to divest $1.5 million from a slave labor company.
These achievements required strong social skills and the ability to endure intense psychological situations.
For example the treasurer who supported my divestment measure and who
told me she would do the same for tobacco stocks had her personal
phone, files and email all infilitrated by the University
Administration.
So people who make a difference take a hit for it. She was fired.
Scott I live a multi-faceted life that you might not be able to understand from a quick perusal of some of my writing.
But I appreciate the attempt and I hope you have enjoyed yourself!
As for you Torbjörn I’m not cutting you any slack!
Have you read Professor Brian Goodwin’s biology books — they’re the foundation for the digital biology revolution at M.I.T.!
You’re just being reductionistic which is old-school thinking.
New school thinking is taking Ones and Zeros and transforming codons into circuits.
Neural networks, photonics, autoionized nanobiomotors.
The future is Fresh and Exciting!
I hope you patent yourself before some creepy scientist does it on the sly without you getting any cut.
Oh but then you’re probably not “indigenous” will rare (valuable) traits.
Yes I’ve exposed such nefarious research going on at the U of
Minnesota and sure enough someone broke into their lab and stole their
blood!
Professor Myers: Glad you made it to old Pig’s Eye. I’m over at
Walter Library waiting for a response to the emails I sent you. haha.
Anyway I’ve been mentioned a couple times on the Magic Randi forum and just for the record I think Randi is a blowhard.
Here’s why: 1) Dr. Jules Eisenbud took Randi up on his “dare me to
prove that your for real” nonsense a few decades ago!! Eisenbud had
signed statements from 25 scientists verifying the veracity of
experiments proving the paranormal capabilities of Ted Serios. The only
online “debunking” of Eisenbud does not even mention the signed
statements. It’s sad really.
2) It would appear that Magic Randi does not even use the ISI Web of
Science database aka the science citation index. For example I recently
debated Professor John W. Hoopes since he dared me to take up Magic
Randi’s $1 million claim. I began listing experiments that prove
paranormal capabilities — all from peer-reviewed journals — and Hoopes
just stated he didn’t have time to review them all. Hoopes also doesn’t
use science citation index — is the fact that professors don’t wanna
hang in the libraries really going to destroy their research
capabilites?
3) The biophoton research of Dr. Alfred-Fritz Popp, by itself, should
be recipient of Magic Randi’s money. But then he’s been verified by
half a dozen other scientists.
What do you know about biophotons vis a vis paranormal studies?
drew hempel, MA
Dan — you’re being quite emotional for a Tai Chi person! How long
can you sit in full-lotus with your feet over your hips — comfortably —
while flexing your pineal gland?
20 minutes of full-lotus equals 4 hours of any other exercise. So your practice sounds great — just not that intense.
Me — I went 8 days with next to no water nor any food and then healed
my mom of a significant disease. Yes, it’s called “bigu” — or energy
fasting and some people in China are on record for going 8 years with no
food. Yes there was an academic study on bigu at a State University by
a professor in California and there was an academic conference by
chemistry professor Rustom Roy.
My teacher went 28 days with no food and water and INCREASED his
energy while doing this and he currently teaches the Mayo clinic
doctors, among other experts:
http://springforestqigong.com
Now let’s respond to your comments.
“Drew:
Who gives a crap about “signed statements”?”
OK Dan — that’s a good one but these are controlled experiments
supervised by scientists and the statements were details about the
protocol. These were University experiments and Magic Randi was asked
to do his little spiel about testing them. Randi refused therefore his
whole “prove to me your real” schtick is just that — a psychological
problem.
“Do you want to tell me that I’m doing it wrong, or that my teacher is no good? You do, don’t you?”
No — I don’t. Sorry.
“I actually laughed out loud when you implied in the Tribe thread that skepticism is a bad thing.”
Please cut and paste where I “implied” such a thing. I’m just MORE
sceptical than others. I read one scholarly book a day to investigate
all matters and I’ve done the experiments. The psicops are not really
skeptics but just boring frauds.
Well that’s a run on sentence. The biophoton experiments have been
repeated in several different countries — all by “certified” university
lab scientists with results published in peer-reviewed academic
journals. The same goes for the qigong experiments. Of course if you
antagonize people or try to steal their equipment then it will probably
effect the results of the experiment.
Both those types of paranormal experiments (qigong and biophoton)
already PROVE the existence of consciousness beyond spacetime as a
useable energy source through body-mind exercises.
Now there’s also the new “quantum electronic” experiments —
superliminal SIGNALS are now sent in controlled lab experiments. These
are not random results verified after the fact but: quasi-telepathy.
The links I already provided give the abstracts to those studies.
The principles of macro quantum chaos science also demonstrate the
validity of homeopathy — as detailed in a recent cover-story article of
New Scientist. I’ll find the link for you (just ‘cuz I’m a nice guy).
Here’s a link on cold fusion — recently completely verified and based
on sound-current — the same principle that is the foundation for my
masters thesis, freely readable online “Epicenters of Justice: music
theory, sound-current nondualism and radical ecology” (U of Minnesota,
2000).
Actually the biophoton experiments are done with charged-coupled devices — a standard technology that revolutionized astronomy.
Anyway I will go over it AGAIN — just for your personal special needs (and Randi’s as well).
1) Replicated experiments have ALREADY proven paranormal powers
therefore Magic James Randi should be paying those scientists already.
Quasi-telepathy is SIGNALS BEYOND SPACETIME. Repeatable signals done in
quantum electronics. Qigong experiments have been conducted hundreds
of times in double-blinded tests. There’s a whole hospital in China
that ONLY uses qigong to successfully heal cancer — against based on
resonating signals beyond spacetime. Biophoton tests demonstrate
information transfer changing the molecular properties, in alignment
with the meridian lines of traditional nonWestern medicine. Those tests
have already been repeated in several labs. Sonofusion has already
been repeated — free energy created by the resonance of crystals.
2) Sitting in a corner, whining, and demanding that scientists go to
meet the special needs of Magic James Randi (and if successful he
promises to pay them) is NOT science. That’s just stupidity. People
who lap up that stuff need help.
3) Dr. Jules Eisnbud already took Magic James Randi up on his claim
and Magic James Randi backed down. Therefore Magic James Randi has
already proven himself to be not sincere in his “quest” to “investigate”
the truth of paranormal powers. That was some 25 years ago and Magic
Randi probably doesn’t want people to know about it.
4) Magic James Randi has already attacked the person I studied with,
Master Chunyi Lin, even though Master Lin has already been endorsed by a
doctor from the Mayo Clinic and other doctors. Why doesn’t Magic James
Randi go and test Master Chunyi Lin — is Magic James Randi afraid he
might find something out that he doesn’t want to deal with? The fact
that Magic Randi has attacked a paranormal healer ALREADY (before he
even considers his work) demonstrates that Magic Randi is not an
“objective” researcher. How is someone not supposed to be affected by
the conditions of the experiment if they are being hassled and abused?
THAT’S NOT SCIENCE (at least not how we are taught to think of science).
5) Professor Harry M. Collins, in his philosophy of science books
(M.I.T. Golem series) and the book “Changing Order,” details the
equivalence of paranormal experiments and science experiments (laser and
gravity wave and theory of relativity tests, etc.) Professor Collins
in a recent essay details how negative results are only useable for
experiments predicted on empirical-based technology. In otherwords
paranormal powers using body-mind techniques are based on a philosophy
of infinity not being an empirical logarithmic-based measurement. You
can not explain the results in terms of Western science therefore the
results are INHERENTLY unproveable by the techniques of western science.
Does that stop the CIA from using them? No, because they work. Dr.
Isabelle Stengers has made the same point and she co-wrote books with
Nobel physicist Ilya Prigogene, the creator of the new chaos science.
Stengers notes how Mesmerism worked it’s just that its results could not
be explained. It should be pointed out that Benjamin Franklin, who
supposedly disproved Mesmerism, was a leader in the The Nine Sisters
secret society, and the other leader was one of the main Mesmerists!
Science and religion have always been interdependent. Just read
Professor David F. Noble’s book “The Religion of Technology.” (1996)
drew hempel, MA
Proving that you can dupe people has nothing to do with disproving paranormal powers!
Anyone can be an asshole and deliberately go around attacking people through deception and fraud.
That’s not at all contigent on detailed, controlled experiments to
rule out such fraud, as was the case with Dr. Jules Eisenbud’s results.
OK — Magic James Randi shows up into town, invites a bunch of
scientists for a display of magic, the scientists are nice people,
cooperate and are fooled.
That doesn’t prove anything!
“It’s not the skeptic’s job to disprove paranormal powers.”
That’s great! But plenty of scientists have already PROVEN
paranormal powers — all the examples I just listed: superliminal
quantum electronics, biophotons, and qigong.
“All we have to do is introduce reasonable doubt.”
Tricking someone and then stating that’s reasonable doubt is just
stupid. For example, as I’ve stated, Dr. Jules Eisenbud had 25
scientists test Ted Serios in controlled experiments specifically
designed to rule out fraud. Magic James Randi was invited by Dr. Jules
Eisenbud to disprove those experiments and he turned it down. The
skeptics then stated that magicians around the turn of the century could
fake photographs and that one of the skeptics then demonstrated to
scientists that he could fake photographs.
Sorry but turn of the century magic — from the late 1800s — is not
anything compared to tightly controlled, sophisticated experiments
verified by 25 scientists from a wide variety of fields.
In otherwords there was no “reasonable doubt” introduced.
“If there’s a simpler explanation (like trickery), that’s all we need
to show. It’s the claimant’s job to prove that he can do what he says
he can do.”
As I already stated Dr. Jules Eisenbud already proved the case, some
25 years ago, and Magic James Randi attacked Dr. Jules Eisenbud. Then
Magic James Randi refused to investigate Dr. Jules Eisenbud’s claim
AFTER Dr. Jules Eisenbud invited Magic James Randi to test his claims.
The simpler explanation is CONSCIOUSNESS — found by basic inference.
From where does the I-thought arise? The I-thought is the foundation
for all thought and just by repeating I-I-I-I over again as a LOGICAL
experiment you discover it’s source as nonlocal consciousness.
Trickery is a less simple explanation than the simple fact that the source of the I-thought is the source of magic.
Basic inference is all that is needed. No belief is necessary.
Dan — it’s highly ironic that the philosophy book “Self-Alerity” is
written by Dan Zahavi. (well his first name is Dan for sure, I’d have
to confirm his last name and the book title but that’s close)
See philosophy is LOGIC not phantasical banter.
Inference is Logic and as DAN Zahavi — Professor Zahavi — points out:
Only the I-thought is self-transcending because it does not signify anything — what does “I” refer to?
That’s the logical question. Again spend some time investigating it —
if you’re a philosopher. It couldn’t be simpler: I-I-I-I-I. If you
do that as a career I assure you it will be most fascinating.
As far as my experience with science — well that seems to be ad hominem.
Science isn’t based on “personal experience” is it? Or maybe that’s just what Magic Randi thinks.
Sure I have a masters degree and have done plenty of science
research, in biology labs, in the field, etc. but more importantly I’ve
passed policy changes with the people who CONTROL SCIENCE.
The lawyer at the U of Minnesota, Marc Rotenberg, controls science.
The regents of the U of Minnesota every year have to sign Title XXII
stating that they will cooperate with the lawyer that runs the U and his
superiors in Washington D.C. to promote
IMPERIALISM.
I’ve researched the whole history of the corporate-state elite control of science.
Consider Oppenheimer. He was commanded to state who wanted to pass
on nuclear secrets to the Ruskies. He was told that he would not be
tortured since we live in a democracy.
OK — who cares? Oppenheimer was creating apocalyptic technology! So
he told the name because he was “commanded” by the military that
controls science and that professor who wanted to share the technology
was immediately fired without being told why.
Democracy. What a total joke but for those who want to play along and not
“test” to see whether it’s true or not — it would appear to be true.
And of course we tortured people — we massacred civilians as well.
So it is with science.
Two words: Quantum chaos. Learn about it.
James Randi — the boy in a bubble.
haha
Dan — seriously I’m enjoying our virtual debate thus far. Quantum
chaos — it’s the top discipline in science yet neither Hoopes, nor you
nor Professor Myers seems to know much about it!
OK — You want to keep on talking about Dr. Jules Eisenbud’s
experiments. You want to keep on creating some simplistic fantasy
world.
Let me repeat the basics. See there’s a book in a library that
anyone can read. It details a vast array of tightly controlled
experiments that were supervised by 25 scientists — Ph.D.s working at a
University. The statement they signed states that the results could not
be explained by any theories in current science nor could the results
be exposed as fraud.
Pretty straight forward stuff and yes their names and affiliation are listed in the book.
Sorry I’m not Ted Serios so I can’t reproduce their images for you to help you out with your special needs.
Now back to quantum chaos.
Here’s another two words that perhaps Professor Myers would like to consider:
1/f Noise.
I’m sure he’ll know enough to know that it transcends the whole I.D. versus Darwin debate.
No more “pop” science stuff.
See the problem with your listing of 3 scientists is that is a
small percentage of the 25 plus scientists. You are using the same
misleading, fraudelent tactics as the Csicops.
I’ve read the book by Dr. Jules Eisenbud. Almost all of the
scientists are in the natural scientists — M.D.s or Ph.Ds in chemistry,
etc.
Again anyone who doesn’t see the obvious is really stupid.
Anyone can see I’ll give you a million dollars if you prove to me whatever I accept as real.
That has nothing to do with science!!
But I’ve given all the links and abstracts and all of you have chosen
to remain ignorant — to not read the information — and to hide in your
little:
“1950’s Science Save Us” cult.
Well we all need a big daddy figure I guess.
Quantum chaos just happens to be the top research field at the top
military labs in the U.S.: Sandia, Los Alamos, Brookhaven, Institute
for Advanced Study, and the Santa Fe Institute.
Some great TECHNOSPIRITUAL science books on quantum chaos are:
George Johnson’s “Fire in the Mind.”
John Casti’s “One True Platonic Heaven.”
And the best-seller “Sync” by professor Steven Strogatz as well as the book he promotes:
“Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis” (2005).
Good luck with your new required reading and welcome to the real world.
drew hempel, MA
Again it’s stupid to make stupid assumptions as the basis for your argument.
OK — if you read the book AS I ALREADY STATED these scientists WORKED AT THE UNIVERSITY WERE JULES EISENBUD WORKED.
Which is maybe why Magic Randi didn’t respond the Dr. Jules Eisenbud’s challenge to Magic Randi’s
$250,000 award. Oh I’m sorry that’s the Creationist Award.
It’s so easy to get them confused.
The below is a nice defense of Professor Myers but I’m talking
about Richard Dawkins being the biggest name behind Synthetic Ecology
and nanobiomotors.
Richard Dawkins — mr. Darwin himself.
Quantum chaos isn’t just limited to the semi-classical realm — it’s based on
MACRO QUANTUM MOLECULES — of which water and Buckyballs are the most prominent examples.
Just search NanoWater and you’ll know why David Rockefeller’s Godson — George Gilder — is a big supporter of
“the Privileged Planet” — i.e. the concept that scientists evolved to transform earth into a Silicon Astral Realm.
So is Robert Jastrow — one of top NASA engineers and promoters of SILICON EVOLUTION.
“And why should an evo-devo expert be expected to be au fait with a
bleeding-edge branch of physics, even if the International Science Cabal
has ranked it at #1.”
“That doesn’t mean they were working in conventional scientific
fields. Having a doctoral degree doesn’t make a person a scientist.”
You wrote the ABOVE. I responded that YES they were working in CONVENTIONAL FIELDS AT A UNIVERSITY.
Direct Response.
Now please try to remember what you type.
I’ll go to the 4th floor of the Central downtown public library in Minneapolis and get the book and type out the details.
I’m on the 3rd floor currently. One moment please.
(jeopardy music is currently playing)
A partial list of signatories follows (that’s what Eisenbud writes)
Dr. Martin M. Alexander, M.D., Professor of Medicine, U of Colorado Medical School
Professor Ralph Baker, Botany, Colorado State University
Profesor of Physiology John L. Chapin, U of Colorado
Professor of Medicine, Harold Elrick U fo Colorado
Professor of Psychiatry James Galvin, U of Colorado
Chairman of Deprartmne tof PHysical Medicine, U of Colordao Jerome W. Gersten
Professor of Psychiatry, Luarenc B. Hall U of Colordao
Chief of Research Laboratory US Veterans Admin Hopsital, Denver, Charles J. Hllad, Jr.
Chief Engineering Physicist and Consulting Engineer, Gates Rubber Company, Denver
J. Allen Hynek, Professor and Chariman of Astronomy Dept, Northwestern University
Professor of Physics Mario Iona, U of Denver
L. J. Joshel, Ph.D Chemistry, Dow Chemical Co, Denver
Dr. Joseph H. Rush, Physicist, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
Ray M. Wainwright, Professor of Electrical Engineering, Colorado State U
Billie W. Wheeler, Director of Audio-visual Education U fo Colordao
Dr. H. Marie Wormington, Curator of Archeology, Denver Museum of Natural History
Let’s try the most recent academic source so we can put all the shenigans to rest:
“The Perfect Medium: Photography and the Occult” (Yale University Press, 2004)
The essay is by Dr. Stephen E. Braude:
“Serios also liked to work with what he called a ‘gismo,’ a short
open cylinder, about an inch in diameter, typically fashioned during the
experimental sessions from the black paper packaged with Polaroid film.
Serios often liked to place the gismo in front of the camera lens,
holding it with his thumb and forefinger. He had apparently developed
the habit of using a gismo during his early Chicago experiments, and now
felt comfortable with it, as if it helped him to focus his thoughts on
the task at hand. Not surprisingly, ciritcs often maintained that
Serios used this device to conceal an image which could then be
projected ono the film.” (see ref. number 2)
Ref. nbr 2: “The primary source of this skeptical allegation was the
article “An amazing Weekend with the Amazing Ted Serios,” in the
October 1967 issue of Popular Phhotography, written by David B.
Eisendrath and Charles Reynolds. The criticsm then morphed into the
unverified claim that Serios’s feats had been duplicated easily by the
magician the Amazing Randi. See, for example, Martin Gardner, Science,
Good, Bad and Bogus (Buffalo: Prometheus books, 1981), and Gardner’s
claim in the journal Nature that Randi “demonstrates it regularly and
with more skill” (vol. 300, no. 11 [1982:p. 119). It should be
emphasized that Gardner’s claim is unsubstantiated. Randi has never
even attempted to duplicate the Serios phenomena under conditions
resembling those that prevailed during Serios’s tests. He, did,
however, fail to duplicate the phenomena under the looser conditions
prevailing on the television show Today on 4 October 1967.”
Main text, next paragraph:
“Critics frequently cited the gismo as grounds for dismissing the
Serios case. In answer, it should be noted that Serios often produced
multiple images in a single experimental session (for example, as many
as fifty separate images during a series of sixty to eighty trials, or
ten to twenty images in a shorter series of trials). Had he been
concealing images in the gismo, he would have needed to replace those
hidden images many times throughout the session, while avoiding the
detection of observers who were watching him closely. The gismo was
usually examined before, during, and after shooting, and no images or
other devices were ever found inside. Second, the gismo was often held
by experimenters until the photograph was taken, thus drastically
reducing the time available for placing an image within the gismo, and
making it all the more difficult for Serios’s alleged trickery to escape
detection. And third, Serios sometimes produced images under
conditions of complete darkness, as well as on unexposed, opaquely
wrapped film. (Significantly, critics refrain from discussing this and
other test conditions that would weaken their claims regarding hidden
devices.)”
“But most importantly, Serios produced more than thirty-six images
when he was positioned one to sixty-six feet away from the camera.
These effects were observed on twelve occasions in different locations
by witnesses who held and triggered the Polaroid camera. For the
hidden-image-in-the-gismo hypothesis to have any credibility, Serios
would have had to be located no more than a fraction of an inch from the
camera lens. Eisenbud and his colleagues tried to duplicate Serios’s
effects with tranparencies placed in the gismo, but could not.
Moreover, for some trials Serios was dressed in clothes provided by the
experimenter (thus eliminating the presumed hiding place for images to
be inserted in the gismo), and in some cases he was separated from the
camera and placed inside an electrically shield Faraday cage. The
picture of three men, dated 22 February 1966 [cat. 72], is one of those
shot while Serios was inside the Faraday cage, the camera held by an
experimenter outside the cage. It should be also noted that the
hidden-image-in-the-gismo hypothesis does not account for Serios’s
ability to produce “blackies” and “whities.”
(pp. 156-7)
October 18, 2006
Well considering the new importance of epigenetics it’s definitely
scientifically viable that macro quantum chaos could change DNA through
focused resonance of thought. It’s also the truth!
October 18, 2006
The endocrine system has hidden potential — specifically the
connection between serotonin and the adrenal glands — just as Professor
Robert Sapolsky. Serotonin turns into Melatonin which turns into DMT.
Now use harmonic resonance and voila! You create a spirit body of
biophotons.
October 18, 2006
“As science advances, those phenomena will emerge out of the
uncertain realm of the paranormal and into the more comfortable domain
of the normal. Such transitional phenomena are called the ‘perinormal,’
meaning near-normal, by fiercely skeptical Cambridge University
zoologist Richard Dawkins. Dawkins offered this new term at a skeptic’s
conference in January 2005. As author Ted Dace wrote in reviewing that
conference, when Dawkins was asked about one of the prizes offered for
demonstrations of the paranormal, he responded: ‘About the million
dollar prize, I would be worried if I were you because of the fact that
we have perinormal possibilities.’ It appears that among skeptics, the
smart players are beginning to hedge their bets.” (p. 290, “Entangled
Minds” 2006, by Dr. Dean Radin).
October 18, 2006
— Passed on for several generations! In male offspring and three subsequent male generations of the rats,
There’s been several studies verifying the INHERITANCE of environmental factors.
October 18, 2006
Professor Meyers blame the stupid computers at the
corporate-controlled institution that pays your bills! The only
repetition was a common loading problem — from the Engineering Library —
not from me!!
My other post was regarding Professor Jeffrey Schwartz — a topic that
Carl Zimmer stopped in it’s tracks, in a debate I had with Stevepinhead
and a couple other posters.
Epigenetics is definitely part of this topic as well.
So that’s 3 different approaches — not repetition at all.
As for being “banned” we’ll I’m just surprised I got in as much as I
did since you normally censor me (how convenient for the Orwellian Truth
of corporate-controlled science — there’s 300 businesses controlling
science at the U of Minnesota).
October 18, 2006
As long as people keep making comments about what I write then responses on my part are reasonable.
The 300 businesses are listed in the research contracts availble from
the Tech Center that runs the U of M — I got the list in 2000 and
analyzed it as part of a self-directed masters class I did with
Professor Robin Brown. I then passed out about 500 copies of the report
— covering the 150 year history of the U of Minnesota as a tool of
Imperial Genocide through corporate control (starting with John
Pillsbury, the Skull and Bones “father” of the U of Minnesota). You can
find reference to my report in a MN Daily article covering my protest
of President Yudof’s State of the University speech. I pointed out an
adminstrator stating that “for enough money we can make tomatoes as big
as basketballs” for Monsanto.
That’s the real story of science — for which Lawrence Soley was fired
from the U of Minnesota, after his book “Leasing the Ivory Tower.”
October 18, 2006
Life after Death — I’m definitely going to give that book a once
over! Thanks. also any more dirt on Deepak Chopra soliciting sex on the
street? I had posted the link on my old blog… but it’s not worth
digging up. The sign of a true spiritual master is the eternal hard-on
for fun!
October 18, 2006
I’m sure Johnjoe McFadden would be game and he has the right
credentials as well — Professor of Genetics — oh wait he’s author of the
book “Quantum Evolution” (2005) so his views lend a “patina” of
respectibility to madhatter Deepak. Oh well, there will be plenty
others willing to ride the wave of fascism in the U.S. — growing the
ultimate “man crop” as those progressive eugenicist Professors
proclaimed in the 1930s.
I’ll come clean with a little diddle, on the sly. Quack or
madhatter comes from quicksilver — mercury — which also, ironically, was
the first scientific use of chemotherapy — a cure for syphilis.
Mercury in vaccines IS a serious problem! But corporate-controlled
science knows how to do the smack down when necessary.
Mercury (cure for S.T.D.s) was really another name for the flying
serpent of Kundalini — sex transformed into spirituality (really just an
asymmetrical harmonic oscillator, previous to logarithmic tuning).
So when scientists label spiritualists as quacks those scientists are
only willfully ignoring how mercury continues to be used in modern
science to the detriment of general health (along with all the other
absurdities of “science”). In my “crank” psychology this is called
“negative transference” (i.e. repressed sexually not known how to be
sublimated into “real” mercury so used for smack-down science).
The “real” use of mercury (beyond quacks and smack-down scientists)
is described in Mutus Liber — the 17th C. alchemy book of the West.
Mercury is the FEMALE principle as water vortex energy since the
negentropic, antigravity anomalies of water are due to water having
special TETRAHEDRON binding properties (as per physics Professor J L
Finney’s 2004 article in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London. “What’s so special about water?”).
Female principle as in nonlocal consciousness, not representable
through a precise symbol for infinity (the square root of two). Female
principle as in lunar-calendar, 60-based number system, controlling the
water cycles for carbon-based evolution.
So we have 25 years left of freshwater (real MERCURY) on the planet —
(the worst ecological crisis in our times and the most ignored) — all
the more reason to bicker about quacks by quacks so that the REAL
scientists (the serious madhatters) can get on with their Freemasonic
Nanowater alchemy experiments at Sandia Labs, etc.
The asymmetrical sine-wave of the atomic electron must be squared!
Detailed in the freely readable online book “Hacking Matter” (mercury
has a 97% refraction rate so is very efficient in nanotechnology).
Now let’s not talk about mecury-based “ion propulsion” being used in secret high-tech flat, equilateral triangle aircraft.
Ken — sorry to say that you’ve been duped by the CIA-Freemason-Gene
Roddenberry Council of Nine “Stargate Conspiracy.” From the promo for
the book “the Only Planet of Choice” — based on CIA mind control
scientist Dr. Andrija Puharich and his Institute for Advanced Study at
Princeton research buddy Professor Oliver L. Reiser: “This is the first
book to deal with the background and reasons for these cosmic visits.
It is made up of hundreds of transcripts transmitted through the channel
Phyllis V Schlemmer over a period of more than 20 years from a group of
universal beings, known as The Council of Nine. Members of a
distinguished international research group who have worked with Phyllis
include such famous names as Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, former
British racing driver Sir John Whitmore, and British Olympic hurdler
David Hemery.”
These are the real scientists! (read the recent books “In the Fire of
the Mind” by George Johnson and “One True Platonic Heaven” by John
Casti — both promote the Freemasonic agenda of Los Alamos, Santa Fe
Institute and Sandia Labs).
October 19, 2006
The UK Guardian, Aug. 25, 2005:
Finding that DNA emits weak but brightly coloured biophotons, Narby
suggested these could be the basis for the luminous patterns in the
ayahuasceros’ visions [from DMT drugs].
Could the shamans be gaining information from DNA itself? Narby
thinks it possible and outlined his theory in The Cosmic Serpent: DNA
and the Origins of Knowledge (1998).
