Einstein: AND USES TELEPATHIC METHODS! Tim Maudlin and the de Broglie Guiding Potential Ether

So after posting numerous comments on Bob Doyle's Information Philosopher youtube channel - actually posting quotes from other science sites - finally after a couple weeks - he actually responded!! With two comments!

So this inspired me to dig deeper. I felt sorry for Bob. He says no one will publish his view. So I sent him Mike Tower's quote - oops - I then realized - it's Mike Towler - who then discusses Tim Maudlin (pdf link). This is a very clear - simple conceptual explanation of the de Broglie model. And it was de Broglie who PREDICTED the Double Slit enigma of diffractions waves for a single particle - in 1923!!

Tim Maudlin points out - Einstein was not so upset about God playing Dice (the name of Bob Doyle's book) but that God uses Telepathy!! haha.

And amazingly somehow this infamous science quote about Einstein saying God doesn't play Dice - leaves out the 2nd half of his sentence!! We can't be mentioning TELEPATHY can we??!! Hilarious! Self-censorship by science. And so Brian Josephson got censored by Mike Towler since all the other scientists were afraid they'd lose their jobs for associating with a Noble Physicist Josephson daring to investigate the strong evidence for real telepathy and other paranormal effects.

By the way Nobel Physicist Josephson emailed a response to me that he does practice qigong at Cambridge. Sweet!! I hope that is not some great secret of his! Oh well.

And Uses Telepathic Methods has been cut out!!

aka "spooky action at a distance."

So here we have an updated de Broglie (Bohm) study of entangled photons and nonlocality. 2016

The crucial here is what de Broglie realized and Bohm later realized and Bell also embraced - there actually is a non-local field that guides matter - and it is a quantum force ether - that is superluminal.

Aka what Roger Penrose calls Proto-consciousness of the Universe. The fact is a good handful of completely real scientists argue this is true! But we are told that science is against religion by mainstream corporate-state society. If you believe in an ether of consciousness that is not material then you are "woo-woo" or a religious fanatic, etc. haha.

The irony being these people are not up to the latest science!!

Mike Towler gave a series of lectures on De Broglie-Bohm quantum nonlocal reality - videos linked

This was the conference that Brian Josephson was "uninvited" from so he didn't "contaminate" it with his research proving paranormal reality. haha.

the guiding potential that the particle experiences.

I am quoting the 2016 paper I linked. and so "mainstream" science insists these are "surreal" trajectories and yet:

a resolution of this seeming inconsistency was proposed by Hiley et al. (18). Here, we present an experimental validation of this resolution, in which the nonlocality of Bohmian mechanics comes to the fore.

Because these two states are orthogonal (〈H|V〉 = 0), it would be intuitive to conclude that such a measurement of the spin of particle 2 would indicate through which slit particle 1 had gone (even though, in orthodox quantum mechanics, the particle has no trajectory and hence did not “go through” either slit). So the claim of Bob Doyle is that the supposed non-locality is only a by-product of doing a statistical repeated measurement that confirms the wave function probability amplitude.
What we find here is that in Bohmian mechanics, contrary to the intuition one may have from orthodox quantum mechanics, the spin of particle 2 is not a constant of motion for propagation in free space. Rather, it evolves, as particle 1 moves along a trajectory. Thus, it is not surprising that in Bohmian mechanics, the spin of particle 2 is not a reliable indicator of which slit particle 1 went through. Now look at the reply Bob Doyle gave to me!

If the two particles start with different spin (1 up, 1 down), and if spin is a conserved quantity in Einstein's objective reality, then they have different spins 100% of the time, right? They are never detected with the same spins, both up or both down! Total spin would then be zero at start, 1 at end, violating conservation.

So how is this paradox resolved? The 2016 paper says that Basil J. Hiley resolves it!

I have corresponded with Professor Hiley - and I quote him on my blog gadgets section - Hiley clearly states there is a noncommutative phase foundation of reality that is non-local and a "novel" self-force or quantum force.

 The resolution [presented by Hiley et al. (18)] of the apparent paradox is in the nonlocality of Bohmian mechanics.

So what Hiley paper is that? 2000. I quote his 2016 paper! I corresponded with Professor Hiley in 2015 I think - precisely about this fundamental noncommutative foundation of reality. His response to me was - "yes I know that there is noncommutative time-frequency" and when time is zero there is quantum entanglement.

In many ways it seemed to be a new form of inner energy possessed by the particle, organising the flow lines in a novel way and suggesting a 'formative' cause rather than the traditional efficient cause.

....quantum phenomena emerged from a non-commutative phase space.

Quantum professor Basil J. Hiley, 2016: "Quantum Trajectories: Dirac, Moyal and Bohm"

Back to the above 2016 paper cited:

  Indeed, our observation of the change in polarization of a free space photon, as a function of the time of measurement of a distant photon (along one reconstructed trajectory), is an exceptionally compelling visualization of the nonlocality inherent in any realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics.

And so this experiment has proven that nonlocality is real - and not just some byproduct of statistical measurements!

O.K. so the study was cited by 60 other studies. Let's take a look.

Measurement of impulsive thrust from a closed radio-frequency cavity in vacuum

H White, P March, J Lawrence, J Vera… - Journal of Propulsion …, 2016 - arc.aiaa.org

PLEASE NOTE: Transactions on ARC will be unavailable for approximately three hours on
Monday, December 12th, between 5:00 – 8:00 pm Eastern Time. Thank you for your patience
and we apologize for the inconvenience … The ultimate in powerlifting. Discover key results

So we get the De Broglie Quantum Force Propulsion!

The first pilot-wave theory was proposed by de Broglie in 1923 where he proposed that a particle interacted with an accompanying guiding wave field, or pilot wave, and this interaction was responsible for guiding the particle along its trajectory, orthogonal to the surfaces of constant phase.

M de Gosson, B Hiley, E Cohen - Annals of Physics, 2016 - Elsevier

Abstract The experimental results of Kocsis et al., Mahler et al. and the proposed
experiments of Morley et al. show that it is possible to construct “trajectories” in interference
regions in a two-slit interferometer. These results call for a theoretical re-appraisal of the

And Hiley - I have not read. As I read it now - it has the same equations used in the Mike Towler lecture I linked above. So Hiley's critique of Mahler (the 2016 paper quoted) is that Mahler uses a quantum dot based on the electromagnetic photon field of Dirac whereas the Bohmian potential requires the Schrodinger wave function or quantum field. And so the experiment is being replicated with a Schrodinger wave function set up.

From quantum measurement to biology via retrocausality

K Matsuno - Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2017 - Elsevier

Abstract A reaction cycle in general or a metabolic cycle in particular owes its evolutionary
emergence to the covering reaction environment acting as a measurement apparatus of a
natural origin. The quantum measurement of the environmental origin underlying the

 Matrix is Real!:

[PDF] We Are Living in a Computer Simulation

DY Chung - Journal of Modern Physics, 2016 - file.scirp.org

Abstract This paper posits that we are living in a computer simulation to simulate physical
reality which has the same computer simulation process as virtual reality (computer-
simulated reality). The computer simulation process involves the digital representation of

So Mike Towler, et. al. assume a foundation of quantum statistical noise as the foundation of the non-local ether - and therefore signals can not be sent that are non-local. But this assumes a left-brain dominance external collapse of the wave function as a right-hand technological measurement. haha.

Another fascinating Tim Maudlin lecture on youtube!