So is Ecology just all Quantum Relativity Computers? Monendra Grover

I was a bit confused by Professor Paola Zizzi's amazing "Big Wow" model (dubbed by Stuart Hameroff). Essentially the quantum gravity or quantum relativity computational power of the Universe became self-conscious or proto-consciousness at the end of cosmic inflation (10 to the minus 33 seconds) when 10 to the 9th power was generated. And the zinger is that if each of our tubulins are quantum dipoles (superpositioned as qubits) then our microtubules as our brain become a fully macroquantum coherent computer with the same 10 to the 9th power of quantum relativistic information processing.

Tubulin Quantum noncommutative Dipole

And so Monendra Grover builds on this model to argue that in fact life on Earth - ecology - is actually a holographic projection of a quantum relativistic black hole reality - a kind of 5th dimension.

And so he follows up on that research first posted in 2011 with a 2016 paper

And so my understanding then is that pure quantum analysis is symmetric infinity and corresponds to our subconscious dream quantum reality whereas quantum relativistic analysis is asymmetric and represents our materialistic gravitational linear sense of time.

The problem with this view - that some of considered to be a kind of teleological campaign for quantum computing as the next level of ecological evolution - is that the mathematics is turned around based on the physics.

In other words the physics analysis starts with Schrodinger's equation that assumes a symmetric math foundation of infinity using a continuum analysis from calculus for position and momentum - it is noncommutative but then converted to commutative symmetric math when the measurement or "collapse" of the wave function takes place. And so the non-commutative foundation is considered to not really exist - the Standard model assumes it is just a mathematical probability and so ontologically the foundation of reality does not exist! That is the Copenhagen Interpretation - as long as the math works why bother about the actual foundation of reality! haha.

But this is not the original quantum analysis of Heisenberg by Louis de Broglie that Schrodinger then built on - the original wave function did actually model the foundation of reality.

And so in effect the math is turned around - it is the relativistic math that is symmetric whereas time-frequency is inherently noncommutative as the quantum foundation.

O.K. so then building on this mathematical switch around - mainstream scientists assume that reality is symmetric only there is a symmetry-breaking in reality with gravitation and inflation - and this has to be converted back into symmetric mathematics to "unify" science. As we can see - not only is this math not working but what are the effects on life on Earth?

the so-called symmetric math with the "symmetry-breaking" at the foundation of cosmology - that we are then "returning to" is actually a reversal of life on earth - imposing a destruction of left-handed amino-acid based life (that is right-brain dominant).

So consider Delhi where Monendra Grover does this high-tech sophisticated Ph.D. level research. 

Top stories

Delhi becomes
“gas chamber” as
air pollution
reaches ludicrous levels

Ars Technica · 4 hours ago

Delhi smog chokes
India capital with
air pollution 10
times worse than Beijing

CBS News · 14 hours ago

Blame game over
Delhi air pollution
begins

The Hindu · 8 hours ago

Is this "evolution" or is it ecological apocalypse? 

In contrast Sir Roger Penrose actually argues the foundation of reality through twistors or spinors is asymmetric time - not symmetric time. It's a subtle difference that Stuart Hameroff might not even understand! But it explains the ecological crisis today. Symmetric-based math as science got it wrong - ever since Plato!