Thelerner at thedaobums wants to censor me.

This is why "editors" and "publishers" don't work for real radical information. Even on a thread at thetaobums - but in the personal practice forum - the person who starts the thread has the liberty to censor anything you post.

He "asks" for my permission but in fact it is just a "formal" nicety on his part. He doesn't have to ask and he is actually commanding me. He is not asking me any questions about the content of what I post. He just says it's off topic. Hilarious. This is typical Westernized thinking - if you don't understand it then attack it and remove it!!

thelerner

Started conversation: 2 hours ago · Report

I like your insights and experience in the Serious Mo Pai thread.  But at time they get a little off subject.  I would never change anything you write but I with your permission I'd like to edit away some of the less relevant.  Being able to do so, makes it more likely I won't hide any of it.  It's not just you, I've intended from the start to heavily edit and monitor the thread.
 
Thus with your permission-
According to what I read - Jim made a hole in the bottom of a tent - to made sure he was sitting on the ground. So I don't think concrete would be good enough. Lonemanpai says to sit on a 5 pound weight - from a bench press - and then have a wire attached to an outside grounding pipe. But personally I would think sitting in a weight would be - annoying at best. <great>
 
No - I would say just meditating outside. Also I think celibacy should be necessary - Lonemanpai thinks you just need celibacy for the first 100 days. <good>
 
Like Nungali posted a porn shot - a New Age porn shot to reply to me - but the mods said nothing about it. haha. Females suck up energy on this forum - seeking out males who have their energy stored up.  (I would strike out as not about Mo Pai and sitting>
 
So I would also state that solitude from females is necessary. The Bushmen San males do a month long retreat away from females. Then there's Shaolin monastery - and cave meditation at Qingchenshan. Retreat is necessary.  (not Mo Pai and sitting)
 
So the question is - John chang is married - so he must know techniques but also he probably did meditation away from his wife is my guess at least at some point in the training.  (Good stuff, but not Mo Pai and sitting.  Hopefully we'll circle around to it)
 
Also the "yin" energy is not just qi but also shen.  (Not Mo Pai and sitting but too good to erase)
 
Thus with you permission I'd edit down the non-sitting parts of your writing.  It's good stuff but by moving away from Mo Pai and sitting it encourages other people to move ahead, and threatens to the tightly controlled thread get into the problems all other Mo Pai threads hit.
 
With your permission I'll do the edit.  Keeping your good insights into Mo Pai sitting and doing away with the other. 

Posted 5 minutes ago · Report post

Is there any evidence that any females are part of Mo Pai in John Chang's school?
 
I don't think so. Why? Because males and females as per Taoism have the opposite energy systems.
 
So the males by building up "yin qi" are turning their "yin jing" into "yang jing."
 
The females in turn are attracted to the males "yang jing" and turn it back into "yin jing" and then reproductive fluids.
 
That's just the facts of life - complementary opposites are the truth of reality - despite "liberated" Westerners trying to pretend that males and females are the same - as this thread is doing.

So they just ignore me. Hilarious.