The end of the video has the scientists saying "in principle you can be in two places at once" and also "you can walk through walls." pdf tuning nanosound into quantum resonance
Do you consider that also to be teleportation? And what about below?
Qigong master Sifu Ho Fatt Nam said his senior classmate could walk through walls.
Also Daoist alchemist master Wang Liping: On more than one occasion, my teacher told us an experience he had with Wang Li Ping in China. He asked about enlightenment and how one really can know if they're enlightened. Sherfu Wang was silent. Suddenly he stood up and left the room, locking door behind him. A moment later he walked back in the room, passing right through the wall as if it didn't even exist. My teacher's jaw dropped as Sherfu calmly and simply explained that when you are enlightened you are truly one with your environment; not just intellectually or spiritually, but totally.
And please consider that SLAC quantum physicist Eddie Oshins realized the secret of Wing Chun training, that he taught, was based on noncommutative phase, as the 5th dimension, allowing Daoist Neigong alchemy training to be real.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I realize this ability is rare - but the most famous Buddhist teacher of China, Master Nan, Huai-chin also describes this ability of his friend. He says he could stick his hand into his friend's "rainbow light" body and asked his friend why he was still playing games instead of seeking the real Dharma? haha. They were both in deep meditation in the mountains in Tibet.
Thank you for your consideration and any comments or questions would be appreciated,
drew hempel
Do Spins have Direction? He asks
Art Hobson, physics professor emeritus, likes to post the same comment on youtube - not sure why he has not gotten spam filtered.
Then if microscopic entities are assumed to obey Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (HUP), as we know they do, one is forced to admit that the concept of "microscopic particle" is a self-contradictory one....Therefore, whatever its nature is, it is a non-spatial entity, and if only for this reason it cannot be considered a particle....But a field is also an entity defined in space, possessing specific actual properties in every point of it (like for instance force vectors).
Hobson rightly observes that the replacement of the concept of particle by the one of field cannot solve such a problem, but what we think he fails to consider is that both the particle and field concepts are inadequate because of the measurement issue.
A quantum "field" can certainly be understood in the abstract sense of a "field of potentialities....In ultimate analysis, what quantum mechanics teaches us is that not all of physical reality is contained within space, and that we need to drop the preconception that so-called microscopic "particles" and quantum "fields" would necessarily be spatial entities.
Quantum fields are not fields - American Association of Physics ...
aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.4811240
by M Sassoli de Bianchi - 2013 -
Let us start by considering the main reason why a quantum entity cannot be considered a particle; we will then show that the same argument applies, mutatis mutandis, to the field concept. On the quantum "self-teleportation" probability of a human body: 2017 pdf link:
Let me explain. An elementary entity, such as a proton, an electron, or an entire hydrogen atom, spends most of its time in a non-spatial (non-local) condition, unless it is incorporated into a macroscopic structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment