Chris Fields: The initial Zero energy, zero time of the Universe explained by science

So I have been posting my "idiot's guide" article on youtube - and discovered this talk by Chris Fields that I found fascinating. I decided to take a closer look and then discovered this Physics Forum thread that ties into the fundamental concept of "heavy light" - the non-zero quantum relativity mass of light when it is "turned around" as is done in meditation.

So these physicists are discussing the paradox of non-zero mass of light due to quantum relativity also arising from asymmetry - or a break in relativity Lorentz translations.

What gets fascinating then is that this discussion between two people is then expanded into Chris Field's research - to the universe as a whole.

But we also get further verification that reality is based on quantum black holes - micro-black holes as the foundation of reality.

So now I have Gerard t'Hooft arguing for micro black holes, and I cited Louis Kauffman recently agreeing with a Stanford quantum physicist - all out of the school of Vignier - and this ties back to de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony.

This initial "zero" paradox as zero time and zero energy - of the universe is explained by noncommutative phase space - being in two places at the same time that is inherently asymmetric and therefore has inertial mass as inherent momentum (but not classical mass as rest mass).

 So Chris Fields applies this to the Universe as a whole to solve the condundrum of the cosmological constant

So - this ties back to Neil Turok pointing out - as I quoted - that light does not experience "scale" of the Universe - light - if we can "imagine" we our light - as Einstein did - and as we now know, that we are light from biophotons as coherent laser spirit consciousness - and so this light, as light, does not experience time or space on its own. But when we take account of the frequency and wavelength of energy-mass of the Universe we discover that it is scale-free, meaning that the different scales cancel out as equalized energy-matter.

But when light is "turned around" as heavy light or quantum relativistic light, this inherent noncommutative phase space then creates energy-matter.

This was known by the ancient alchemists and now it is being rediscovered by physicists, just as classical physics is destroying the ecology on Earth. We live in interesting times indeed.

My contribution (in 1995) was to identify a specific system with large amount of symmetry that allowed us to do this calculation reliably. The results from black holes indeed matched those of the elementary particles in that system, giving concrete evidence that small black holes indeed describe elementary particles.

And here - so micro black holes are left-handed charged? That corroborates my claim of "female formless awareness!"

  In particular, this entropy has the correct dependence on three independent parameters, the mass and the left-handed charge of the black hole, and the string coupling constant.

So Chris Fields posted his research on the "independent" science pdf site -  yielding this comment:

 Chris,

Your conclusion, "Its and bits are duals; its are co-bits and bits are co-its. Its and bits are both results of the process of tensor-product decomposition and hence of observation, not inputs to it. Its and bits are, therefore, model-theoretic entities, not physical entities." is very profound as well as your comment, "If its are to be inferred from bits, some of the bits must come not from observation or even memory, but out of thin air."

Your statement that some of the bits must come from thin air, I found to be a factual statement of causality for something that is truly causal cannot exist until it does.

 So this is the noncommutative phase-space - he apparently doesn't realize it and thinks it's still symmetric. But the "out of thin air" - or free energy means that momentum violates conservation of energy due to asymmetric time as eternal motion of light energy.

Hi Dr. Chris Fields: You have a brilliant solution to the cosmological constant. What do you think of Erik Verlinde's work? You cite quantum cognition research in your 2016 symmetry paper. Those researchers don't seem to cite Eddie Oshins - the Stanford quantum physicist who developed quantum psychology in the 1970s. His focus was noncommutative logic, and noncommutative quaternions and also quaternion hand movements - from his Wing Chun/Tai Chi or Neigong training. Do you know the work of Eddie Oshins? thanks. http://www.quantumpsychology.com/

Have you considered Eddie Oshins work? He did a talk on Anaximander that I have not heard yet - and you reference Heraclitus in your entanglement talk - regarding the imaginary number. Louis M. Kauffman who worked with Eddie Oshins argues that the imaginary number is a noncommutative time series that is the foundation of reality. We can change the phase which then changes the synchronized resonance of our observation and participation with time as consciousness. But in fact as BJ Hiley agrees, when time is "zero" there is quantum entanglement yet there is also noncommutative time-frequency resonance. This is noncommutative phase-space, as recognized by Alain Connes, Peter Rowlands, Paul S. Wesson, Eddie Oshins and others but it originates from quantum relativity - de Broglie's Law of Phase Harmony.

So your bit-it model to me seems to be noncommutative but Western logic, as Gregory Bateson points out, has time paradoxes, that remain in mathematics, hence the incommensurability of the continuum. You are saying "physically nothing is happening" and so the boundary is imaginary - and so noncommutative is just a classical byproduct of observing the boundary?

It seems to me you are assuming that observation is left-brain dominant whereas in meditation we can have observation that is pure light, and light can be heavy, as quantum relative, with hidden momentum as non-zero inertial mass.

Considering the Western science, since Plato and Achytas, is based on symmetric math, the classical physics actually has created immense entropy externally (in ecology and social justice) - as logarithmic mathematics-based technology.

So when you say - there is no objective time and the interaction is a "double arrow" affair - to me this is actually noncommutative phase space as being in two places at the same time. This was modeled by nonwestern music theory as meditation. Thanks, drew